Genetic Patents Catch-22: Can Challenging a Patent Require Risking Infringement?

Sep 15, 2025

1 minute read

Inari Agriculture filed mandamus petition asking Federal Circuit to overturn PTAB's denial of PGR challenging Pioneer Hi-Bred's inbred corn patent 11,659,803. PTAB denied Inari's obviousness challenge because Inari failed to sequence deposited seed genome defining claimed plant variety. Inari argues this creates unconstitutional "Catch-22" requiring challengers to risk infringement liability to file adequate PGR petitions, violating due process. Patent claims seed/plant of inbred maize variety described only through phenotypic characteristics without genetic sequence data.

Read the full story on Patentlyo

Stay Informed!

Be among the first to receive our Litigation News Feed when it goes live.