IP Verse

1348671 B.C. Ltd. V. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associates Identified On Schedule A - 1:24-cv-09479

Explore the details of the 1348671 B.C. Ltd. V. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associates Identified On Schedule A case under case number 1:24-cv-09479 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-09479
Filing Date
Oct 4, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Tongliao City Junyang Trade Bank -
WeiYiNgJie -
kaharv-0 -
kidscornerse -
1348671 B.C. LTD. -
levy_le_kpc5iex -
Kunming sun Shang Mu trading Co., LTD -
rahshw-47-Store -
misophia -
liel.leo -
SummerPavilion -
cozyhomestylel -
electronicemporiumm -
oroore-znt4nmy0 -
Easy Households Choice -
ShengManHeng -
HeJuun -
asel_27-Store -
staryutique -
Healthyhabitse -
trendytreasuressUser -
wangbaolongamaaz -
GuangZhouLangMingS hangMaoYouXianGon gSi -
PSJHONE -
Grief Grocery K -
XinXiongZXJ -
BaguGlobalHub -
mingridianzishangwu -
A1S4G0J6BGI2DJ -
ZHANHAIY -
avebodi -
GoldMund Store -
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A -
YangMei12 -
zhengzhoucihaoshang maoyouxiangongsi -
zhangwenjian -
LIUQINGQINGJIAYO U -
tangcen -
SJPBK -
Doraimi instigated Lassi -
ZhiYuanZhenCT -
Qearl A -
Kuipuiry -
Rattan Leaf -
XiaJunQing -
XinWanYue -
yinghaodianzishangwu -
WEIHE us -
paitingkeji -
seifer -
Eliyaho -
RuteShell -
A1UDQZ3A23XFR2 -
xianlieshangmao -
suronghuanghg -
BOYUANSCH -
cicidy -
renjunbixwp3B7RlX -
goodtimebuying -
stylishfurniture -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Oct 4, 2024ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff 1348671 B.C. LTD. by Nicholas S. Lee (Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 10/04/2024)PACER Document
Oct 4, 2024CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (bi, )PACER Document
Oct 4, 2024CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (bi, )PACER Document
Oct 4, 2024MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(rc, ) (Entered: 10/07/2024)PACER Document
Nov 1, 2024MEMORANDUM by 1348671 B.C. LTD. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 12 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee, # 2 Exhibit 1)(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 11/01/2024)PACER Document
Nov 6, 2024ORDER Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 11/6/2024:For the reasons set forth in the Statement below, the plaintiff's motion for a temporaryrestraining order 12 is denied without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a renewed motion, along with the documents specified in the Statement, by 12/6/24. If the plaintiff fails to do so by that date, this document will be unsealed. Mailed notice(air, ) (Entered: 11/06/2024)PACER Document
Jan 6, 2025NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by 1348671 B.C. LTD. as to certain Defendants (Def. Nos. 21, 22, 26, 28, 33-51, 53, 54, 56, 58, and 59) (Haque, Sameeul) (Entered: 01/06/2025)PACER Document
Jan 6, 2025MEMORANDUM by 1348671 B.C. LTD. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 24 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Redacted), # 2 Declaration of Dean A. Pinkert, # 3 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Dean A. Pinkert, # 4 Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee, # 5 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee, # 6 Declaration of Victor Chahin)(Haque, Sameeul) (Entered: 01/06/2025)PACER Document
Jan 6, 2025EXHIBIT by Plaintiff 1348671 B.C. LTD. Exhibit A, Part 1 of 2 regarding memorandum in support of motion, 25 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Def. No. 1, # 2 Exhibit Def. No. 2, # 3 Exhibit Def. No. 3, # 4 Exhibit Def. No. 4, # 5 Exhibit Def. No. 5, # 6 Exhibit Def. No. 6, # 7 Exhibit Def. No. 7, # 8 Exhibit Def. No. 8, # 9 Exhibit Def. No. 9, # 10 Exhibit Def. No. 10, # 11 Exhibit Def. No. 11, # 12 Exhibit Def. No. 12, # 13 Exhibit Def. No. 13, # 14 Exhibit Def. No. 14, # 15 Exhibit Def. No. 15, # 16 Exhibit Def. No. 16, # 17 Exhibit Def. No. 17, # 18 Exhibit Def. No. 18, # 19 Exhibit Def. No. 19, # 20 Exhibit Def. No. 20, # 21 Exhibit Def. No. 23, # 22 Exhibit Def. No. 24, Part 1, # 23 Exhibit Def. No. 24, Part 2, # 24 Exhibit Def. No. 25, Part 1, # 25 Exhibit Def. No. 25, Part 2)(Haque, Sameeul) Modified on 4/22/2025 (smb, ). (Entered: 01/06/2025)PACER Document
Jan 6, 2025EXHIBIT by Plaintiff 1348671 B.C. LTD. Exhibit A, Part 2 of 2 regarding memorandum in support of motion, 25 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Def. No. 27, # 2 Exhibit Def. No. 29, # 3 Exhibit Def. No. 30, # 4 Exhibit Def. No. 31, # 5 Exhibit Def. No. 32, # 6 Exhibit Def. No. 52, # 7 Exhibit Def. No. 55, # 8 Exhibit Def. No. 57)(Haque, Sameeul) Modified on 4/22/2025 (smb, ). (Entered: 01/06/2025)PACER Document
Jan 7, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr Upon receipt of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) 23, defendant nos. 21-22, 26, 28, 33-51, 53-54, 56, and 58-59 are dismissed from this case. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 01/07/2025)PACER Document
Mar 11, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: By order dated 2/10/25 35, the Court gave the plaintiff until 2/21/25 to file a second renewed motion for a TRO addressing the concerns raised on 1/7/25 33 . As of today, no such motion has been filed. The plaintiff is directed, by 3/28/25, to file a status report indicating how it intends to proceed in this case. The plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process 14 is denied without prejudice; the plaintiff may renew its motion by 3/28/25 if it plans to move forward with litigation. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 03/11/2025)PACER Document
Mar 28, 2025STATUS Report by 1348671 B.C. LTD. (Haque, Sameeul) (Entered: 03/28/2025)PACER Document
Mar 31, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's status report 38, which indicates that the plaintiff "intends to serve the Defendants and proceed with the normal course of litigation." The Court understands this language to mean that the plaintiff no longer intends to move for a TRO. That decision does not remove the need for information that the Court previously requested. By 4/18/25, the plaintiff must provide the Court with the following: (1) A listing of all prior online trademark, copyright, or patent infringement cases (that is, Schedule A cases) filed in any court in the United States in which it was a plaintiff; (2) a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that the plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case; (3) a certification that the plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence in its complaint [5-3] or claim charts 26 27 in any prior proceeding; and (4) an index that matches each defendant to the screenshot(s) in the complaint [5-3] and its claim chart 26 27, lists the dates the relevant screenshots were taken, and identifies, on a defendant-by-defendant basis, the specific patent(s) each defendant has allegedly infringed. The plaintiff must also provide the Court with (5) a supplemental brief explaining why joinder is proper under the America Invents Act, 35 U.S.C. § 299, particularly given that not all defendants seem to sell the same product. See, e.g., Oakley, Inc. v. Schedule A, No. 21-cv-00536, 2021 WL 308882, at *1-2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2021) (propriety of joinder tied to sale of same accused product, and allegation "that the defendants all sold infringing products" insufficient). Finally, if the plaintiff believes continued sealing is warranted in light of its decision not to pursue a TRO, it must provide (6) an explanation as to why the Court should maintain the documents in this case under seal. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 03/31/2025)PACER Document
Apr 18, 2025DECLARATION of Nicholas S. Lee regarding text entry,,,,,,,, 39 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Index of Defendant in response to Minute Entry 39 )(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 04/18/2025)PACER Document
Apr 28, 2025NEW PARTIES: XinXiongZXJ, HeJuun, Tongliao City Junyang Trade Bank, WeiYiNgJie, Kunming sun Shang Mu trading Co., LTD, suronghuanghg, ZhiYuanZhenCT, zhengzhoucihaoshang maoyouxiangongsi, yinghaodianzishangwu, zhangwenjian, mingridianzishangwu, WEIHE us, GuangZhouLangMingS hangMaoYouXianGon gSi, ShengManHeng, PSJHONE, SummerPavilion, LIUQINGQINGJIAYO U, ZHANHAIY, wangbaolongamaaz, paitingkeji, tangcen, BOYUANSCH, SJPBK, Rattan Leaf, Kuipuiry, XiaJunQing, XinWanYue, renjunbixwp3B7RlX, seifer, Eliyaho, staryutique, asel_27-Store, RuteShell, GoldMund Store, levy_le_kpc5iex, rahshw-47-Store, oroore-znt4nmy0, kaharv-0, liel.leo, goodtimebuying, electronicemporiumm, kidscornerse, Healthyhabitse, misophia, trendytreasuressUser, cicidy, cozyhomestylel, stylishfurniture, avebodi, BaguGlobalHub, Qearl A, Doraimi instigated Lassi, Grief Grocery K, Easy Households Choice, YangMei12, xianlieshangmao, A1UDQZ3A23XFR2 and A1S4G0J6BGI2DJ added to case caption. (Haque, Sameeul)PACER Document
Apr 28, 2025NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by 1348671 B.C. LTD. as to Defendant Nos. 2 through 59, in accordance with Minute Entry 44 (Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 04/28/2025)PACER Document
Apr 29, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Given the plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint 46, the notice of voluntary dismissal as to defendant nos. 2-59 45 is unnecessary. The only defendant remaining in this matter is XinXiongZXJ, defendant no. 1 in the amended Schedule A [46-1]. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 04/29/2025)PACER Document
Jun 17, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: In its 4/21/25 order 44, the Court granted the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Since the filing of that complaint 46 on 4/28/25, the plaintiff has taken no action in this case. By 6/30/25, the plaintiff shall file a status report indicating how it intends to proceed. Failure to comply with this deadline, or further unexplained delay, may result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. See James v. McDonald's Corp., 417 F.3d 672, 681 (7th Cir. 2005) ("A district court has the authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) to enter a sua sponte order of dismissal for lack of prosecution."). Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 06/17/2025)PACER Document
Jul 1, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:In its 6/17/25 order 49, the Court directed the plaintiff to file a status report by 6/30/25. As of today's date, no report has been filed. Given the plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's instructions, and in view of (1) similar failures in the past 36, and (2) the Court's warning that noncompliance "may result in dismissal of this case," the case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See, e.g., Hawthorne v. Chang, No. 05-cv-00219, 2007 WL 128349, at *1 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 9, 2007) (district courts "have inherent authority to dismiss a case" sua sponte for failure to prosecute, assuming explicit warning is given); Truesdale v. Guerra, No. 07-cv-03058, 2008 WL 1968773, at *8 (N.D. Ill. May 1, 2008) (district courts have the power to dismiss cases for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders). All future dates and deadlines are stricken; all pending motions are denied as moot. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of the remaining defendant. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 07/01/2025)PACER Document