IP Verse

Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. V. Curevac Se - 2:23-cv-00610

Explore the details of the Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. V. Curevac Se case under case number 2:23-cv-00610 involving a cause of action for Patent Non-Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:23-cv-00610
Filing Date
Nov 13, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Non-Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. -
Paulo Lin -
Michael Hope -
Barbara Mui -
CureVac SE -
Ying Tam -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Apr 8, 2024Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Saurabh Gupta and Certification of Local Counsel Robert W. McFarland Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9460602. by Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Michael Hope, Paulo Lin, Barbara Mui, Ying Tam. (McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 04/08/2024)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2024ORDER granting 38 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 4/9/2024. (Walker, Jamar) (Entered: 04/09/2024)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2024ORDER granting 39 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 4/9/2024. (Walker, Jamar) (Entered: 04/09/2024)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2024ORDER granting 40 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 4/9/2024. (Walker, Jamar) (Entered: 04/09/2024)PACER Document
Apr 25, 2024NOTICE of Settlement by CureVac SE (Erbach, John) (Entered: 04/25/2024)PACER Document
Nov 13, 2023Complaint Public Version ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9216699.), filed by Paulo Lin, Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Barbara Mui. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A- US11241493, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B- US11471525, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - US11576966, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - US11596686)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2023)Attachment
Nov 13, 2023Complaint Public Version ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9216699.), filed by Paulo Lin, Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Barbara Mui. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A- US11241493, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B- US11471525, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - US11576966, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - US11596686)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2023)Attachment
Nov 13, 2023Complaint Public Version ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9216699.), filed by Paulo Lin, Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Barbara Mui. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A- US11241493, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B- US11471525, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - US11576966, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - US11596686)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2023)Attachment
Nov 13, 2023Complaint Public Version ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9216699.), filed by Paulo Lin, Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Barbara Mui. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A- US11241493, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B- US11471525, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - US11576966, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - US11596686)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2023)Attachment
Nov 13, 2023Complaint Public Version ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9216699.), filed by Paulo Lin, Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Barbara Mui. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A- US11241493, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B- US11471525, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - US11576966, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - US11596686)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2023)Attachment
Apr 26, 2024Set Remote Hearing (CV Magistrate)Members of the public wishing to listen to remote proceedings should call the Norfolk Division at 757-222-7222 before the hearing for instructions on how to listen to the proceedings. Recording of court proceedings of any kind is prohibited. Status Conference set for 4/29/2024 at 12:00 PM in Norfolk Remote w/OCR before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (cdod, )PACER Document
Apr 30, 2024TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 4-29-2024, before Judge Douglas E. Miller, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/30/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/1/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/29/2024.(stewart, jody) (Entered: 04/30/2024)PACER Document
Apr 29, 2024Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller:Status Conference held on 4/29/2024. Proceedings:Matters came on for status conference. Counsel all present via zoom. Counsel present see attached list. A Notice of Settlement between CureVac and Acuitas was filed in both matters on April 25, 2024. The parties present the status of the cases to the Court based on this pleading. Mr. Wexler spoke on behalf of BioNTech, Mr. Groombridge spoke on behalf of Acuitas and Mr. Izraelewicz spoke on behalf of CureVac. Counsel discussed with the Court how they envision the case moving forward now that the Notice of Settlement has been filed and their positions as to how all parties are affected. The Court directed that the parties confer within the 14 day period from the 4/26/24 date of the filing of objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pfizer and BioNTech shall file a response to the objection. In the meantime, Acuitas is still in the case. The parties shall confer regarding discovery from Acuitas and getting that discovery served. The Court will rule promptly after receiving all filings. Hearing adjourned. (Attachments: # 1 List of Participating Counsel) (Court Reporter Jody Stewart, OCR.)(cdod, ) (Entered: 05/01/2024)PACER Document
May 14, 2024Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rule 41 Dismissal of Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. by CureVac SE. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Erbach, John) (Entered: 05/14/2024)PACER Document
May 15, 2024ORDER granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Rule 41 Dismissal. The Parties shall file an endorsed dismissal order no later than May 28, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 5/15/24. (jhie, ) (Entered: 05/15/2024)PACER Document
May 28, 2024Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rule 41 Dismissal by Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Michael Hope, Paulo Lin, Barbara Mui, Ying Tam. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 05/28/2024)PACER Document
May 29, 2024ORDER granting 49 Motion for Extension of Time to File. It is ORDERED THAT the Motion for Extension is Granted, and the parties shall have until June 11,2024, to file a dismissal order in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 5/29/2024. (Vpea) (Entered: 05/29/2024)PACER Document
Jun 11, 2024STIPULATION of Dismissal by Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Michael Hope, Paulo Lin, Barbara Mui, Ying Tam. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(McFarland, Robert) (Entered: 06/11/2024)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2024DISMISSAL ORDER- It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the above styled action is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs, with the Court retaining jurisdiction solely for purposes of enforcing the parties settlement. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 6/24/2024. (Vpea) (Entered: 06/24/2024)PACER Document
Feb 26, 2025ORDER granting in part and denying in part (770) Motion to Close Courtroom in case 2:23-cv-00222-JKW-DEM. For the reasons stated at the beginning of the hearing the Court DENIED the request to close the courtroom during arguments, instead advising counsel that mention of confidential license terms would not be necessary in light of the court's access to the sealed licenses. If a transcript is ordered -- it shall remain under seal until any party or non-party having appeared to protect confidential material, submits a request for redactions. If such requests are submitted, the undersigned magistrate judge will determine whether to permit the redactions in the public transcript under the standards set forth in Local Rule 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on February 26, 2025. Associated Cases: 2:23-cv-00222-JKW-DEM, 2:23-cv-00610-JKW-DEM(Miller, Douglas) (Entered: 02/26/2025)PACER Document