Explore the details of the Analytical Technologies, Llc V. American Dairy Queen Corporation case under case number 2:24-cv-00445 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-00445
Filing Date
Jun 14, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Analytical Technologies, LLC -
American Dairy Queen Corporation -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Feb 17, 2025MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/17/2025)PACER Document
Feb 17, 2025MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/17/2025)Attachment
Feb 17, 2025MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/17/2025)Attachment
Feb 17, 2025MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/17/2025)Attachment
Feb 17, 2025MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/17/2025)Attachment
Feb 20, 2025NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rene A Vazquez on behalf of Leigh Rothschild (Vazquez, Rene) (Entered: 02/20/2025)PACER Document
Feb 24, 2025PAPER TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Starbucks Corporation for proceedings held on February 24, 2025 Motion Hearing before Judge Roy S. Payne. (Forwarded to Ed Reed) (Smith, Melissa) Modified on 2/25/2025 (NKL). (Entered: 02/24/2025)PACER Document
Feb 25, 2025Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne: Motion Hearing held on 2/25/2025 from 09:02 - 10:02 re 93 MOTION to Compel DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND FOR ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO RULE 37 filed by Starbucks Corporation, 86 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Leigh Rothschild. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Rene Vazquez; Defense - Rachael Lamkin and Melissa Smith. No exhibits. (Court Reporter - Ed Reed) (bga) (Entered: 02/25/2025)PACER Document
Feb 25, 2025PAPER TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by American Dairy Queen Corporation for proceedings held on 2/24/2025 Motion Hearing before Judge Roy S. Payne. (Forwarded to Ed Reed) (Bonilla, Ricardo) Modified on 2/26/2025 (NKL). (Entered: 02/25/2025)PACER Document
Feb 26, 2025ORDER granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 02/25/2025. (KLC) (Entered: 02/26/2025)PACER Document
Feb 28, 2025UNOPPOSED MOTION to Withdraw 96 MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/28/2025)PACER Document
Feb 28, 2025UNOPPOSED MOTION to Withdraw 96 MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 02/28/2025)Attachment
Feb 28, 2025NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on 2/24/2025 before Judge Roy S. Payne. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Edward L. Reed,Telephone number: 409-330-1605. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.txed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Motion to Redact due 3/21/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/29/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/28/2025)PACER Document
Mar 3, 2025ORDER granting 102 Motion to Withdraw 102 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Withdraw 96 MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION NOTICE OF STARBUCKS LEAD COUNSEL RACHAEL LAMKIN . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 03/02/2025. (KLC) (Entered: 03/03/2025)PACER Document
Aug 6, 2025SEALED ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENT to Main Document: 105 JOINT MOTION to Stay . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Vazquez, Rene) (Entered: 08/06/2025)PACER Document
Aug 6, 2025JOINT MOTION to Stay by Analytical Technologies, LLC. (Vazquez, Rene) (Entered: 08/06/2025)PACER Document
Aug 6, 2025CORRECTED MOTION to Stay re 105 JOINT MOTION to Stay, 106 Sealed Additional Attachment by Analytical Technologies, LLC. (Vazquez, Rene) (Entered: 08/06/2025)PACER Document
Aug 11, 2025ORDER denying 107 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 08/07/2025. (mdj) (Entered: 08/11/2025)PACER Document
Aug 6, 2025Clerk's LR CV-10(d) Notice of Deficiency as to 105 Motion to Stay - LR CV-7(i) or LR CR-47(a)(3) requires this document to include a certificate of conference that complies with the rule. Recommended cure: Within one day, Filer must refile with the word Corrected in the title of the document. The filer should use the same ECF event and when offered the docket text enhancement dropdown, select CORRECTED so it will also appear in the docket text. (mdj)PACER Document