IP Verse

Bitsight Technologies, Inc. V. Normshield Inc. - 1:23-cv-12055

Bitsight Technologies, Inc. V. Normshield Inc. (Case No. 1:23-cv-12055), filed on Sep 5, 2023 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts involving patent infringement. This case involves patent infringement claims between the parties. Explore details about the litigants, key filings, and major docket updates.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-12055
Filing Date
Sep 5, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Court
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
NormShield Inc. -
BitSight Technologies, Inc. -

Patents Involved

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Dec 18, 2023Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered Granting 41 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to January 12, 2024 to File Answer re 39 Amended Complaint, and for a Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule and to Exceed Page Limits. (York, Steve) (Entered: 12/18/2023)PACER Document
Jan 12, 2024Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 43 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Kelly Grosshuesch. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Dore, Samantha) (Entered: 01/12/2024)PACER Document
Apr 4, 2024ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion re 45 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. A Motion Hearing is set for 5/2/2024 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 20 (In person only) before Judge Myong J. Joun. (York, Steve) (Entered: 04/04/2024)PACER Document
Apr 8, 2024Judge Myong J. Joun: ORDER entered re 51 Motion for Order to Set a Scheduling Conference. Plaintiff Bitsight Technologies, Inc.'s motion for order to set a scheduling conference, Doc. No. 51, is DENIED. A scheduling conference will be set after resolution of the pending motion to dismiss. (York, Steve) (Entered: 04/08/2024)PACER Document
Apr 11, 2024ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing on Motion re 45 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. The Motion Hearing on 5/2/2024 in Courtroom 20 (In person only) before Judge Myong J. Joun is rescheduled to 12:00 p.m.. Please note the change in time. (York, Steve) (Entered: 04/11/2024)PACER Document
May 2, 2024Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Myong J. Joun: Motion Hearing held on 5/2/2024 re 45 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by NormShield Inc.. The Court heard arguments from the parties as to the pending motion and took the matter under advisement. (Court Reporter: Catherine Zelinski at [email protected].)(Attorneys present: Kline, Birbach & Grosshuesch for plaintiff; Bramhall, Elihu & Wolkoff for the defendant) (York, Steve) (Entered: 05/02/2024)PACER Document
Jun 3, 2024NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, available on the court website at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/transcripts.htm (Cook, Savannah) (Entered: 06/03/2024)PACER Document
Sep 20, 2024 Judge Myong J. Joun: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Black Kite's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 45 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted as to BitSight 9;s patent infringement claims, Counts 1 through 5. It is denied as to BitSight's false advertising claims and related state law claims, Counts 6 through 8, excluding any claim resting on "other security attestations" beyond questionnaires and custom questionnaire mapping. (York, Steve)PACER Document