IP Verse

Chromacode Inc. V. Bio Rad Laboratories Inc. - 5:23-cv-06360

Explore the details of the Chromacode Inc. V. Bio Rad Laboratories Inc. case under case number 5:23-cv-06360 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
5:23-cv-06360
Filing Date
Dec 11, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
California Institute of Technology -
ChromaCode Inc. -
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jul 19, 2024Brief Opening Claim Construction Brief filed byChromaCode Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Eric P. Tuttle, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D)(Candido, Amy) (Filed on 7/19/2024) (Entered: 07/19/2024)PACER Document
Aug 2, 2024Brief re 73 Brief - Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed byBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Derek Walter in Support, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) 73 ) (Walter, Derek) (Filed on 8/2/2024) (Entered: 08/02/2024)PACER Document
Aug 9, 2024Brief - Reply Claim Construction Brief filed byChromaCode Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Eric P. Tuttle (Reply Decl.), # 2 Exhibit 1 to Reply Decl., # 3 Exhibit 2 to Reply Decl.)(Candido, Amy) (Filed on 8/9/2024) (Entered: 08/09/2024)PACER Document
Aug 16, 2024ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/16/2024. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2024) (Entered: 08/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 6, 2024Transcript of Proceedings held on 12/03/2024, before Judge Eumi K. Lee. Court Reporter Ruth Levine Ekhaus, RMR, RDR, FCRR, CCG, CSR No. 12219, telephone number [email protected]/(415)336-5223. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (93 in 5:23-cv-04823-EKL) Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/6/2025. (rre, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2024) (Entered: 12/06/2024)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2024CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2024. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/davila-edward-j-ejd/ (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2024) (Entered: 01/19/2024)PACER Document
Apr 1, 2024CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING PRE-SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CALL AND IN-PERSON SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.In-Person Settlement Conference set for 7/17/24 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor.Settlement conference statements are due by 7/10/24.Pre-Settlement Conference Call set for 7/15/24 at 1:30 PM.Counsel emailed Judge van Keulen's AT&T Conference Call information.The parties shall familiarize themselves with Judge van Keulen's Standing Order re: Settlement Conference Procedures at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/svkorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024) (Entered: 04/01/2024)PACER Document
Jul 5, 2024CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING HEARING. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2024 is VACATED - No Appearance Necessary. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2024) (Entered: 07/05/2024)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen: In Person Settlement Conference held on 7/17/2024.Negotiations continue.Time in Court: 5 hours. Court Reporter: Not reported/recorded. Plaintiff Attorney ChromaCode: Amy Candido & Eric Tuttle with Client Representatives Aditya Rajagopal, Founder and Chairman & Paul Flook, CEO.Plaintiff Attorney Caltech: Jesse Salen with Client Representative Chantal DApuzzo, Associate General Counsel. Defendant Attorney: Edward Reines & Derek Walter with Client Representatives John Cassingham, Patent Counsel and Assistant Secretary, Josh Shinoff, VP of Business Development & Louis Wai, Associate General Counsel, Intellectual Prop. Pre-Settlement Conference Call with counsel Amy Candido & Eric Tuttle for Plaintiff ChromaCode & Edward Reines and Derek Walter for Defendant Bio-Rad held on 7/15/24.Time in Court: 1 hour.Total Time in Court: 6 hours. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 7/17/2024) (Entered: 07/17/2024)PACER Document
Aug 15, 2024NOTICE of Appearance filed by Cole Uzat on behalf of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Uzat, Cole) (Filed on 8/15/2024) (Entered: 08/15/2024)PACER Document
Aug 20, 2024ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Eumi K. Lee in the San Jose Division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials EKL immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Lee by the moving party for a date consistent with the Court’s law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule.4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoffs remain unchanged.5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for after December 4, 2024, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered.6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before December 4, 2024, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (eg., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases.7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice.8. On or before September 16, 2024, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlines in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District. the approved form for such statements can be accessed here: a. The parties are not required to complete a section if inapplicable. As number 20, the statement shall provide the following information: (i) a list or description of each party; (ii) a summary of all claims, counter-claims, cross-claims, or third party claims and the date the complaint and cross-complaint(s) were filed; and (iii) a brief procedural history of the case (chart format welcomed) including, but not limited to, any ADR proceedings or settlement conferences that have been scheduled or concluded and any appellate proceedings that are pending or concluded. b. If the parties believe that an immediate case management conference is needed, the parties shall explain why and identify the urgent matters that require attention. If there is no immediate need, a case management conference will be scheduled or reset pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order as needed. 9. The Joint Case Management Statement will not constitute a motion to extend or modify dates. If emergency relief is needed to modify a deadline, and the deadline is not of the type that can be modified via stipulation of the parties without a court order, the requesting party or parties shall additionally file a motion or stipulation for such relief in compliance with Local Rule 6.IT IS SO ORDERED.Dated: 08/20/2024FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2024) (Entered: 08/20/2024)PACER Document
Aug 21, 2024Case Reassigned to Judge Eumi K Lee. Judge Edward J. Davila no longer assigned to the case. (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2024)PACER Document
Aug 23, 2024NOTICE of Appearance filed by Sonja Gerrard on behalf of ChromaCode Inc. (Gerrard, Sonja) (Filed on 8/23/2024) (Entered: 08/23/2024)PACER Document
Oct 21, 2024DISREGARD CLERK'S NOTICE: See Dkt. 86 in 5:23-cv-04823 EKL. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2024) Modified on 10/24/2024 (lmh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/21/2024)PACER Document