IP Verse

Contempo Card Company, Inc. V. Superior Bindery, Inc. - 1:23-cv-11990

Explore the details of the Contempo Card Company, Inc. V. Superior Bindery, Inc. case under case number 1:23-cv-11990 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-11990
Filing Date
Aug 29, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Judge Robert B. Collings -
Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc. -
Contempo Card Company, Inc. -
Superior Bindery, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 8, 2024BRIEF by Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc., Superior Bindery, Inc. Supplemental Authority for Claim Construction. (Attachments: # (1) Supplement Ariosa, # (2) Supplement Litton, # (3) Exhibit A, # (4) Exhibit B, # (5) Exhibit C, # (6) Exhibit D, # (7) Exhibit E, # (8) Exhibit F, # (9) Exhibit G, # (10) Exhibit H, # (11) Exhibit I, # (12) Exhibit J)(Tinger, Justin)PACER Document
Aug 12, 2024BRIEF by Contempo Card Company, Inc. Supplemental Authority for Claim Construction. (Attachments: # (1) Supplement Best Medical, # (2) Supplement Daiichi, # (3) Supplement Envtl., # (4) Supplement Dystar, # (5) Affidavit)(Cohen, Kenneth )PACER Document
Aug 14, 2024First JOINT STATEMENT of counsel re ADR. (Tinger, Justin)PACER Document
Aug 20, 2024First MOTION to Strike Inventor's Affidavit (Dkt. No. 51-5) by Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc., Superior Bindery, Inc..(Tinger, Justin)PACER Document
Sep 3, 2024Opposition re [53] First MOTION to Strike Inventor's Affidavit (Dkt. No. 51-5) filed by Contempo Card Company, Inc.. (Cohen, Kenneth )PACER Document
Sep 10, 2024First MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Opposition (Dkt. No. 54) by Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc., Superior Bindery, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Proposed Reply)(Tinger, Justin)PACER Document
Sep 11, 2024REPLY to Response to [53] First MOTION to Strike Inventor's Affidavit (Dkt. No. 51-5) filed by Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc., Superior Bindery, Inc.. (Tinger, Justin)PACER Document
Sep 23, 2024First MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike by Contempo Card Company, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Proposed Sur-Reply)(Cohen, Kenneth )PACER Document
Sep 25, 2024SUR-REPLY to Motion re [53] First MOTION to Strike Inventor's Affidavit (Dkt. No. 51-5) re Defendants' Reply (Dkt. No. 57) filed by Contempo Card Company, Inc.. (Cohen, Kenneth )PACER Document
Dec 3, 2024Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Defendants' Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Vark Markarian (Dkt. [53]) is DENIED. The Court construes the disputed terms as follows: 1. The term "box" means "container."2. The term "outer box" means "outer container." 3. The term "inner box" means "inner container."4. The term "reaching" means "to touch or grasp by extending a part of the body or an object."5. The term "retain" means "hold the inner box within the outer box."6. The term "slots are not large enough for a child's finger" is not indefinite.7. The term "the contact surfaces" is not indefinite. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)PACER Document
Jul 9, 2024Magistrate Judge Robert B Collings: ELECTRONIC REPORT OF ADR PROCEEDINGS entered. Mediation sessions were held on June 17 and June 26 2024. The case DID NOT SETTLE. Litigation should resume in accordance with the trial judge's scheduling orders.PACER Document
Jul 23, 2024Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot [38] Joint Motion to Mediate Between Contempo Card Company and Superior Bindery. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)PACER Document
Jul 23, 2024ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing on [32] Plaintiff's CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Contempo Card Company, Inc. . MARKMAN Hearing set for 8/6/2024 09:30 AM in Courtroom 19 (In person only) before Judge Patti B. Saris. (mm)PACER Document
Aug 5, 2024Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered DENIED re [47] First Motion to Continue Markman Hearing to 10/15/2024 or later by Revolutionary Clinics II, Inc., Superior Bindery, Inc.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)PACER Document
Aug 6, 2024Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Patti B. Saris: Hearing re: Markman hearing held on 8/6/2024.All matters taken under advisement.Counsel shall notify the court by 8/14/2024 whether or not they agree to refer matter back to ADR. (Atty present: McLane, Tinger)(Court Reporter: Debra Joyce at [email protected].) (mm)PACER Document
Sep 11, 2024Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered Granting [55] Motion for Leave to File a Reply re [53] Motion to Strike. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)PACER Document
Sep 24, 2024Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [58] Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)PACER Document