IP Verse

Dpf Alternatives, Llc V. Det Diesel Emission Technologies, Llc - 1:23-cv-02860

Explore the details of the Dpf Alternatives, Llc V. Det Diesel Emission Technologies, Llc case under case number 1:23-cv-02860 involving a cause of action for - Penalty & Forfeiture Illegal Use of Word Patent (False Marking). Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-02860
Filing Date
Oct 30, 2023
Cause of Action
- Penalty & Forfeiture Illegal Use of Word Patent (False Marking)
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC -
Synergy Catalyst, LLC -
DPF Alternatives, LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Feb 22, 2024Notice to the parties of change in conference line phone number for Magistrate Judge Neureiter. The parties shall call the new conference line at 571-353-2301, Access Code 841686937# for all future telephonic hearings. (rvill, ) (Entered: 02/22/2024)PACER Document
Feb 23, 2024NOTICE of Filing of Response in MDL Action by Defendants DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC, Synergy Catalyst, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Cunningham, Michael) (Entered: 02/23/2024)PACER Document
Feb 23, 2024NOTICE of Filing of Response in MDL Action by Defendants DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC, Synergy Catalyst, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Cunningham, Michael) (Entered: 02/23/2024)Attachment
Feb 23, 2024Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff DPF Alternatives, LLC. (Marion, Michael) (Entered: 02/23/2024)PACER Document
Mar 1, 2024MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 3/1/2024. The Scheduling Conference in this case is continued for April 10, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. pending the resolution of the MDL issue as discussed on the record. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at 571-353-2301, Access Code 841686937# at the scheduled time. FTR: A401. (trvo, ) (Entered: 03/01/2024)PACER Document
Mar 6, 2024MOTION for Leave to file sur-reply to 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Strike 18 Reply to Response to Motion, in the alternative by Plaintiff DPF Alternatives, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Proposed Surreply))(Marion, Michael) (Entered: 03/06/2024)Attachment
Mar 7, 2024MINUTE ORDER re: 26 MOTION for Leave to file sur-reply to 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike 18 Reply to Response to Motion, in the alternative filed by DPF Alternatives, LLC. Defendants shall file a response on or before the close of business on March 14, 2024. No replies are permitted unless requested by the Court. By U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/7/2024. Text Only Entry (skclc1) (Entered: 03/07/2024)PACER Document
Mar 14, 2024RESPONSE to 26 MOTION for Leave to file sur-reply to 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike 18 Reply to Response to Motion, in the alternative filed by Defendants DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC, Synergy Catalyst, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(David, Bryan) (Entered: 03/14/2024)PACER Document
Mar 14, 2024RESPONSE to 26 MOTION for Leave to file sur-reply to 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike 18 Reply to Response to Motion, in the alternative filed by Defendants DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC, Synergy Catalyst, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(David, Bryan) (Entered: 03/14/2024)Attachment
Mar 15, 2024ORDER re 26 Motion for Leave; 26 Motion to Strike. In light of Defendants' representation they do not oppose Plaintiff's proposed surreply, the Motion for Leave is GRANTED and the Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. In their Response, Defendants seek leave to file a sur-surreply. A party, however, is not permitted to make requests for relief in a response and this request should be denied as a matter of course. Nevertheless, the Court will take Defendants' request under advisement. The Court is capable of recognizing when a party goes beyond the appropriate scope of the arguments and may choose to simply disregard any of Plaintiff's contentions that do so. If the Court does choose to review these arguments, it will also consider Defendants' sur-surreply. SO ORDERED by U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/15/2024. Text Only Entry (skclc1) (Entered: 03/15/2024)PACER Document
Apr 10, 2024MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter: Scheduling Conference held on 4/11/2024. FTR: Courtroom A401. (rvill, ) (Entered: 04/11/2024)PACER Document
Apr 19, 2024Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff DPF Alternatives, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Marion, Michael) (Entered: 04/19/2024)Attachment
Apr 19, 2024MEMORANDUM: re 33 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by DPF Alternatives, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/19/2024. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) (Entered: 04/19/2024)PACER Document