IP Verse

Earin Ab V. Skullcandy, Inc. - 1:24-cv-00275

Explore the details of the Earin Ab V. Skullcandy, Inc. case under case number 1:24-cv-00275 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-00275
Filing Date
Mar 1, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Skullcandy, Inc. -
Earin AB -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 24, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of Skullcandy, Inc.'s Second Amended Responses to Earin AB's First Set of Request for Production (Nos. 1-34) and First Amended Responses to Earin AB's Second Set of Request for Production (Nos. 35-36) filed by Skullcandy, Inc..(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 06/24/2025)PACER Document
Jun 27, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of i) Skullcandy, Inc.'s Third Amended Responses to Earin AB's First Set of Request for Production (Nos. 1-34); ii) Skullcandy, Inc.'s Disclosures Under Paragraph 3 of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery; and iii) Skullcandy, Inc's First Amended Initial Disclosures filed by Skullcandy, Inc..(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 06/27/2025)PACER Document
Jul 2, 2025Stipulated Motion Requesting Rescheduling of the Claim Construction Hearing, by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stover, Chad) Modified on 7/2/2025 (nms). (Entered: 07/02/2025)PACER Document
Jul 3, 2025ORDER Granting 58 Stipulated Motion Requesting Rescheduling of the Claim Construction Hearing (*Reset Hearings: The Markman Hearing is now rescheduled to 9/24/2025 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/3/2025. (nms) (Entered: 07/03/2025)PACER Document
Jul 3, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Earin AB's First Amended Initial Infringement Contentions and Claim Charts filed by Earin AB.(Farnan, Brian) (Entered: 07/03/2025)PACER Document
Jul 8, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of Skullcandy, Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 20-39) to Earin AB filed by Skullcandy, Inc..(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 07/08/2025)PACER Document
Jul 14, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant's Answering Claim Construction Brief filed by Skullcandy, Inc..(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 07/14/2025)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2025NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant's First Amended Initial Invalidity Contentions filed by Skullcandy, Inc..(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 07/17/2025)PACER Document
Dec 18, 2024ORAL ORDER: The Rule 16(b) Conference scheduled for 12/19/2024, is CANCELED. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/18/2024. (aas) (Entered: 12/18/2024)PACER Document
Dec 18, 2024Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Glenn R. Bronson, J. Jeffrey Gunn, and James C. Watson. ( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4573503).(Stover, Chad) (Entered: 12/18/2024)PACER Document
Dec 18, 2024SO ORDERED, re 26 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Glenn R. Bronson, J. Jeffrey Gunn and James C. Watson, filed by Skullcandy, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/18/2024. (aas)PACER Document
Dec 19, 2024Pro Hac Vice Attorney Glenn R. Bronson, James C. Watson, Jeffrey J. Gunn for Skullcandy, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd)PACER Document
Apr 3, 2025CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf for D.I. 38 has been replaced with an amended version per filing counsel's request and opposing counsel's approval. (nms)PACER Document
Apr 21, 2025ORAL ORDER: Oral Argument regarding the Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review of the Asserted Patent (D.I. 33 ) is set for 5/6/2025, at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6A. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/21/2025. (aas) Modified on 4/21/2025 (nms). (Entered: 04/21/2025)PACER Document
May 2, 2025ORAL ORDER: I read the briefs in connection with the motion to stay. Each side's positions are clear. Oral argument would not change the outcome. Therefore, the oral argument is CANCELLED. The motion to stay (D.I. 33 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal after an institution decision, expected in October 2025. Renewal may be made by a one-page letter. The main basis for denial is that institution and subsequent invalidation is too speculative. At this point, the parties should proceed on the assumption that institution will be denied and the present schedule will be kept. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/2/2025. (aas) (Entered: 05/02/2025)PACER Document