Explore the details of the Ep Family Corp. V. Office Kick Inc. case under case number 2:24-cv-00667 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-00667
Filing Date
Jan 24, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
EP Family Corp. -
Office Kick, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 2, 2024(DUPLICATE ENTRY) COUNTERCLAIMS against Counterdefendant EP Family Corp. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Office Kick, Inc. (Second Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed as one document, see document no. 38). (gk)PACER Document
Aug 22, 2024ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: GRANTING 39 Non-Resident Attorney Isaku M. Begert APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Office Kick, Inc., designating James Doroshow as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lt) (Entered: 08/22/2024)PACER Document
Aug 22, 2024ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: GRANTING 40 Non-Resident Attorney Raymond R. Ricordati APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Office Kick, Inc., designating James Doroshow as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lt) (Entered: 08/22/2024)PACER Document
Jan 15, 2025(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff filed a request to vacate the January 31, 2025 claim construction hearing in this matter. Dkt. No. 50. Plaintiff indicates it now agrees with Defendants proposed constructions and that each term should be afforded its plain and ordinary meaning. Id. Defendant filed an opening claim construction brief also indicating each term should take its plain and ordinary meaning. Dkt. No. 51. In view of Plaintiffs change in position and representations, it appears there are no longer any claim construction disputes in this matter. The parties shall meet and confer to confirm there are no longer any claim construction disputes. The parties shall then file a joint stipulation to vacate the claim construction hearing. The parties shall file the joint stipulation within seven days of this Order. If the parties identify any disputes during their meet and confer, they shall instead file a joint status report indicating the disputes and providing a proposed schedule to resolve them. SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dta) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/15/2025)PACER Document
Dec 24, 2024NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by plaintiff EP Family Corp.. Motion set for hearing on 1/31/2025 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order) (Wang, Songfong) (Entered: 12/24/2024)Attachment
Dec 24, 2024NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by plaintiff EP Family Corp.. Motion set for hearing on 1/31/2025 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order) (Wang, Songfong) (Entered: 12/24/2024)Attachment
Jan 3, 2025MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 49 filed by Counter Claimant Office Kick, Inc., Defendant Office Kick, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Chance Knapp, # 2 Declaration of Isaku M. Begert)(Horton, Benjamin) (Entered: 01/03/2025)Attachment
Jan 3, 2025MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 49 filed by Counter Claimant Office Kick, Inc., Defendant Office Kick, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Chance Knapp, # 2 Declaration of Isaku M. Begert)(Horton, Benjamin) (Entered: 01/03/2025)Attachment
Jan 17, 2025REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 49 filed by Plaintiff EP Family Corp.. (Wang, Songfong) (Entered: 01/17/2025)PACER Document
Jan 22, 2025STATUS REPORT Joint filed by Counter Claimant Office Kick, Inc., Defendant Office Kick, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Exhibit 1)(Horton, Benjamin) (Entered: 01/22/2025)PACER Document
Mar 20, 2024First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Office Kick, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1, filed by Plaintiff EP Family Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Wang, Songfong) (Entered: 03/20/2024)Attachment
Mar 20, 2024First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Office Kick, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1, filed by Plaintiff EP Family Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Wang, Songfong) (Entered: 03/20/2024)Attachment
Jan 22, 2025STATUS REPORT Joint filed by Counter Claimant Office Kick, Inc., Defendant Office Kick, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Exhibit 1)(Horton, Benjamin) (Entered: 01/22/2025)Attachment
Jan 24, 2025Notice filed by Defendant Office Kick, Inc.. of Junior Counsel to Conduct Oral Argument on Motion to Stay (Horton, Benjamin) (Entered: 01/24/2025)PACER Document
Feb 4, 2025MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING IPR by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff's Motion 49 is GRANTED. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report within ten days of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") institution decision on both inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings. If the PTAB denies institution for both proceedings, the parties shall provide a proposed schedule. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 02/07/2025)PACER Document
Jan 29, 2025(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING AND MOTION (DKT. 49 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion and Claim Construction Hearing, noticed for hearing on 1/31/2025, have been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dta) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/29/2025)PACER Document
May 28, 2025ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Based on the Stipulation of the parties 59 . This action in its entirety is DISMISSED without prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)PACER Document