IP Verse

Flying Heliball, Llc V. Zero Zero Robotics Inc. - 8:24-cv-01838

Explore the details of the Flying Heliball, Llc V. Zero Zero Robotics Inc. case under case number 8:24-cv-01838 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
8:24-cv-01838
Filing Date
Aug 21, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
TikTok, Inc. -
Zero Zero Robotics Inc. -
Shopify (USA), Inc. -
Hangzhou Zero Cloud Intelligent Control Technology Co. -
ShenzhenZero Zero Infinity Technology Co., Ltd. -
Flying Heliball, LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Mar 28, 2025Notice of Plaintiff at Settlement Conference filed by Plaintiff Flying Heliball, LLC. (O'Brien, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025)PACER Document
Mar 28, 2025Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice of Service of Process filed by Plaintiff Flying Heliball, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 4/24/2025 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration Declaration, # 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (O'Brien, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025)PACER Document
Nov 19, 2024(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: On the courts own motion, the hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss 27 is CONTINUED from December 12, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., to December 16, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 10D. See Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 11 (1983) (noting trial courts have broad discretion in matters of continuances); Mediterranean Enters., Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458, 1465 (9th Cir. 1983) (The trial court possesses the inherent power to control its own docket and calendar.) Notwithstanding the new hearing date, deadlines for the parties briefing based on the previous hearing date remain the same. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/19/2024)PACER Document
Jan 28, 2025SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Before the court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 50 . The court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 01/30/2025, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED/OFF CALENDAR and the court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rrp) (Entered: 01/28/2025)PACER Document
Feb 10, 2025SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Summons by Email 52 . The court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 02/13/2025, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED/OFF CALENDAR and the court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rrp) (Entered: 02/10/2025)PACER Document
Mar 28, 2025(IN CHAMBERS ) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court is in receipt of the "[Proposed] Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Serve Foreign Defendant," (Dkt. 76 ("Proposed Order One"), and the attachment to Proposed Order One, the "[Proposed] Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Serve Foreign Defendant," (Dkt. 76-1 ("Proposed Order Two") (collectively, "Both Proposed Orders"). The court has also reviewed the files and records of the case and the applicable law. Both Proposed Orders contains the following statement: "The Motion to Extend Time to Serve Foreign Defendants of Plaintiff Flying Heliball, LLC came before the Court for hearing and review." (See Proposed Order One at 1, Proposed Order Two at 1.) However, the court finds there is no motion, memorandum of points and authorities, and/or declaration in the record to support either of Both Proposed Orders. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, based on the state of the record, as applied to the applicable law, the court finds Both Proposed Orders make an insufficient showing for the relief sought. Therefore, Both Proposed Orders are DENIED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY (rrp) (Entered: 03/28/2025)PACER Document
Mar 28, 2025SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Plaintiff was ordered to file a Notice containing certain information by noon on March 28, 2025, or the Settlement Conference conditionally set for April 17, 2025, would be vacated. See Dkt. 72 at 2. Plaintiff did not file a Notice by that time. As a result, the Settlement Conference previously conditionally set for April 17, 2025, is VACATED and will not proceed.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/28/2025)PACER Document
Nov 11, 2024NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/12/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 2 Declaration of Ben M. Davidson In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 3 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief) (Davidson, Ben) (Entered: 11/11/2024)Attachment
Nov 11, 2024NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/12/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 2 Declaration of Ben M. Davidson In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 3 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief) (Davidson, Ben) (Entered: 11/11/2024)Attachment
Nov 11, 2024NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/12/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 2 Declaration of Ben M. Davidson In Support of Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief, # 3 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Zero Zero Robotics Notice of Motion To Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Because the Original Complaint (Dkt 1) and Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt 18-5) Fail To State a Claim For Relief) (Davidson, Ben) (Entered: 11/11/2024)Attachment
May 28, 2025 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court, having been advised by a Notice of Intent to Dismiss 86 that this action settled, hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. Any pending Order to Show Cause is hereby discharged. See document for further information. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)PACER Document