IP Verse

Greenthread, Llc V. Intel Corporation - 3:22-cv-02001

Explore the details of the Greenthread, Llc V. Intel Corporation case under case number 3:22-cv-02001 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
3:22-cv-02001
Filing Date
Dec 29, 2022
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Intel Corporation -
Greenthread, LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jan 12, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Abigail Lauer Litow. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782755 17 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 12, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Jon Carter. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782768 18 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 12, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Christopher Decoro. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8782794 19 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 12, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Defendant Intel Corporation's Applications/Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 as to Attorneys Gregory S. Arovas, Robert Appleby, Jon Carter, Christopher DeCoro, Todd Friedman, Abigail Lauer Litow, Bao Nguyen, John Rhine, Leslie M. Schmidt, and Nyika O. Strickland. (gm) (Entered: 01/12/2023)PACER Document
Jan 12, 2023Clerk's Notice of Mailing to non-admitted counsel of record regarding Order 20 . (gm) (Entered: 01/12/2023)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John B. Campbell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790477 23 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nicholas Theodore Matich, IV. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8790506 24 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Alan Lee Whitehurst. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790523 25 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Arvind Jairam. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790532 26 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Plaintiff Greenthread, LLC's Applications/Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 23, 24, 25 & 26 as to Attorneys John B. Campbell, Nicholas Theodore Matich, IV, Alan Lee Whitehurst & Arvind Jairam. (gm) (Entered: 01/19/2023)PACER Document
Jan 20, 2023A duplicate payment in the amount of $300.00 was submitted by Greenthread, LLC in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court's website. Refund Request is Due 1/30/2023. (nd) (Entered: 01/20/2023)PACER Document
Jan 24, 2023Clerk's Notice of Pay.gov Refund regarding Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790464. The request has been granted and the amount of $300.00 will be refunded to Edward Miller Related Doc 29 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically,. (nd) (Entered: 01/24/2023)PACER Document
Feb 1, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: The Court has thoroughly reviewed the parties' 1/30/2023 Joint Status Report. The parties shall file the dispositive complaint and responsive pleading/motion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas ("WDTX") within seven days. Additionally, any other motions/briefing emanating from the WDTX and in need of a ruling shall be lodged in this case within seven days. The Court will make a determination concerning case deadlines, the need for a Markman hearing, and the timing/phasing of discovery after it has had the chance to review the parties' past filings and any relevant WDTX rulings. Regarding electronically stored information, plaintiff is entitled to e-mail discovery from the eight specific witnesses defendant previously identified. The limitations imposed on discovery relating to interrogatories, RFPs, and RFAs under the Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedures shall govern this case. Finally, if the parties would like a protective order to issue in this District, they must confer and file an appropriate motion in accordance with FRCP 26(c) and LR 26-4. (gm) (Entered: 02/01/2023)PACER Document
Feb 1, 2023Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Attorney J. Stephen Ravel regarding Order 34 . (gm) (Entered: 02/01/2023)PACER Document
Feb 14, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Defendant Intel Corporation's partially opposed Motion for a Status Conference 37 is Denied with leave to renew. As previously stated in the 2/1/2023 Order 34, the Court will determine case deadlines (including the need for a status conference), the need for a Markman hearing, and the timing/phasing of discovery after it has the opportunity to review the parties' past filings and any relevant Western District of Texas rulings. The Clerk in the District of Oregon is directed to file the Amended Complaint (attached as Ex. 1 to the parties' Joint Brief 36 ) as of 12/21/2022, the date the case between Plaintiff and Defendant Intel Corporation (only) was severed and opened in the District of Oregon. (gm) (Entered: 02/14/2023)PACER Document
Feb 16, 2023Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Attorney J. Stephen Ravel regarding Order 42 . (gm) (Entered: 02/16/2023)PACER Document
Mar 16, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Findings & Recommendation 44 is referred to Judge Michael H. Simon for review. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the court. Thereafter, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days within which to file a response to the objections. (gm) (Entered: 03/16/2023)PACER Document
Mar 24, 2023ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Objection to F & R, ECF 46 . Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by April 20, 2023. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 03/24/2023)PACER Document
Apr 12, 2023ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting the parties' Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines 48 . As the parties have settled this matter in principle, the case deadlines are Stayed. The parties shall file Final Papers on or before 5/12/2023. (gm) (Entered: 04/12/2023)PACER Document
Feb 8, 2023Joint Brief in Response to February 1, 2023 Order. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Exhibit, # 21 Exhibit, # 22 Exhibit) (Mina, Gregory) (Entered: 02/08/2023)Attachment