Explore the details of the Hyatt v. Stewart case under case number 1:25cv01230 involving a cause of action for Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:25cv01230
Filing Date
Jul 23, 2025
Cause of Action
Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Status
-
Case Link
View Case
Nature of Suit
Patent

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Gilbert P. Hyatt -
Coke Morgan Stewart -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jul 23, 2025Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-10305136.), filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeLaquil, Mark) (Entered: 07/23/2025)PACER Document
Jul 23, 2025Proposed Summons to the Attorney General of the United States by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) (Entered: 07/23/2025)PACER Document
Jul 23, 2025Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) (Entered: 07/23/2025)PACER Document
Jul 23, 2025Proposed Summons to the U.S. Attorney for the EDVA by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) (Entered: 07/23/2025)PACER Document
Jul 23, 2025Report on the filing of a determination or action by Gilbert P. Hyatt (Proposed AO 120 Form) (DeLaquil, Mark) Modified to correct docket text on 7/24/2025 (swil). (Entered: 07/23/2025)PACER Document
Jul 24, 2025Summons Issued as to Coke Morgan Stewart, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: # 1 Summons Notice)(swil) (Entered: 07/24/2025)PACER Document
Jul 24, 2025Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (swil)PACER Document