IP Verse

Innomemory, Llc V. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. - 2:24-cv-00151

Explore the details of the Innomemory, Llc V. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. case under case number 2:24-cv-00151 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-00151
Filing Date
Mar 1, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. -
InnoMemory, LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 12, 2024ORDER granting 19 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), 18 MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion for Judgment under Rule 12(c), 18 MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion for Judgment under Rule 12(c), 17 MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) Responses due by 9/13/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/12/2024. (CH) (Entered: 08/12/2024)PACER Document
Aug 22, 2024UNOPPOSED MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Eric H. Findlay by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 08/22/2024)PACER Document
Aug 22, 2024NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Charles Smith on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Smith, Michael) (Entered: 08/22/2024)PACER Document
Aug 26, 2024ORDER granting 21 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Eric Hugh Findlay terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/26/2024. (CH) (Entered: 08/26/2024)PACER Document
Sep 9, 2024CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:24-cv-0146. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for venue determinations and trial. The Court will enter one docket control order, one protective order, and one discovery order that will govern the entire consolidated case.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/8/2024. (NKL) (Entered: 09/09/2024)PACER Document
Apr 23, 2025Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mdj) (Entered: 04/23/2025)PACER Document
Apr 23, 2025ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 04/22/2025. (mdj) (Entered: 04/23/2025)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )PACER Document
May 13, 2024Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to 6/12/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH)PACER Document
Jun 11, 2024Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to 6/27/2024. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)PACER Document
Jul 2, 2024Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to 8/10/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH)PACER Document
Aug 23, 2024NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling/Case Management Conference RESET for 9/5/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga)PACER Document
Sep 5, 2024Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 9/5/24. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the magistrate judge. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Courts proposed docket control order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within fourteen days. The deadlines in the original notice setting scheduling conference will run from today, instead of the original date set. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Benjamin Deming and Michael Deming; Defense - Scott Hemingway and Michael Smith. (No exhibits)(Court Reporter Not Recorded.) (bga)PACER Document
Aug 9, 2024MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Sept. 30, 2022 Order Granting Dismissal InnoMemory v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Civ. No. 6:22cv00672 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2022), # 2 Exhibit 2 - Business Wire & Market Screener Jan. 24, 2011 News Release, # 3 Exhibit 3 - SO-DIMM Definition TechTerm, # 4 Proposed Order)(Hemingway, D) (Entered: 08/09/2024)Attachment
Aug 9, 2024MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Sept. 30, 2022 Order Granting Dismissal InnoMemory v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Civ. No. 6:22cv00672 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2022), # 2 Exhibit 2 - Business Wire & Market Screener Jan. 24, 2011 News Release, # 3 Exhibit 3 - SO-DIMM Definition TechTerm, # 4 Proposed Order)(Hemingway, D) (Entered: 08/09/2024)Attachment
Aug 9, 2024MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Sept. 30, 2022 Order Granting Dismissal InnoMemory v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Civ. No. 6:22cv00672 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2022), # 2 Exhibit 2 - Business Wire & Market Screener Jan. 24, 2011 News Release, # 3 Exhibit 3 - SO-DIMM Definition TechTerm, # 4 Proposed Order)(Hemingway, D) (Entered: 08/09/2024)Attachment
Aug 9, 2024MOTION to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Sept. 30, 2022 Order Granting Dismissal InnoMemory v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Civ. No. 6:22cv00672 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2022), # 2 Exhibit 2 - Business Wire & Market Screener Jan. 24, 2011 News Release, # 3 Exhibit 3 - SO-DIMM Definition TechTerm, # 4 Proposed Order)(Hemingway, D) (Entered: 08/09/2024)Attachment