IP Verse

Inomed Techonologies Inc. V. Ucla Health - 2:23-cv-05268

Explore the details of the Inomed Techonologies Inc. V. Ucla Health case under case number 2:23-cv-05268 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:23-cv-05268
Filing Date
Jul 3, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
INNOMED TECHNOLOGIES, INC -
AKIRA ISHIYAMA -
UCLA HEALTH -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jul 3, 2023COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35602022 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff INNOMED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Peter Weinstein added to party INNOMED TECHNOLOGIES, INC(pty:pla))(Weinstein, Peter) (Entered: 07/03/2023)PACER Document
Jul 26, 2023 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REQUIRED COPYRIGHT, PATENT, AND TRADEMARK REPORTING REQUIREMENTS by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than August 2, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (see document for further details) (hr)PACER Document
Oct 10, 2023 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause on or before October 24, 2023 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (see document for further details) (hr)PACER Document
Nov 9, 2023 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) FINAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing proof of service of the complaint by no later than November 30, 2023. If plaintiff files no such proof of service or other adequate response to this order by that deadline, this action will be dismissed involuntarily for failure to prosecute and obey court orders with no further notice. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)PACER Document
Jan 2, 2024 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: On November 9, 2023, the Court issued a Final Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (ECF 14 ). A response to the Final Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than November 30, 2023. No timely response having been filed to the Courts Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint (ECF 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. See L.R. 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (et)PACER Document