IP Verse

Intelitrac, Inc. V. Vision Box Systems, Inc. - 1:23-cv-00313

Explore the details of the Intelitrac, Inc. V. Vision Box Systems, Inc. case under case number 1:23-cv-00313 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-00313
Filing Date
Mar 22, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Vision Box Systems, Inc. -
InteliTrac Inc -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

May 8, 2023SO ORDERED re 94 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/8/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
May 8, 2023ORAL ORDER re 72 MOTION to Dismiss - In light of 96 Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, the Court DENIES as MOOT 72 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as it relates to the 61 Second Amended Complaint. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/8/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 05/08/2023)PACER Document
May 8, 2023SO ORDERED re 95 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Emily Wasserman and Maxwell Hamilton of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP filed by Vision Box Systems, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/8/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
May 9, 2023Pro Hac Vice Attorney Maxwell Hamilton and Emily Wasserman for Vision Box Systems, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)PACER Document
May 17, 2023SO ORDERED re 98 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Third Amended Complaint (D.I. 96) to June 5, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Vision Box Systems, Inc. answer due 6/5/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/17/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Jun 28, 2023ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 7/7/2023, Plaintiff shall file a status report as to service on Vision Box Solucoes de Visao por Computador S.A., including the estimated time of when service may be complete. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/28/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 06/28/2023)PACER Document
Jun 30, 2023SO ORDERED re 103 MOTION to Substitute Attorney: Stamatios Stamoulis to be substituted for R. Montgomery Donaldson. Attorney Richard Montgomery Donaldson terminated. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/30/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Jul 5, 2023SO ORDERED re 105 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jennifer S. Allen of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP filed by Vision Box Systems, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/5/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Jul 6, 2023Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jennifer S. Allen for Vision Box Systems, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)PACER Document
Jul 11, 2023ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/11/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 07/11/2023)PACER Document
Oct 10, 2023CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 117 has been deleted from the docket at the request of counsel. (dlw)PACER Document
Oct 16, 2023SO ORDERED re 119 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a proposed Protective Order to October 18, 2023. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/16/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Feb 8, 2024ORAL ORDER re 129 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File Fourth Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with paragraph 9 of the 116 Scheduling Order entered in this case. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/8/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 02/08/2024)PACER Document
Feb 28, 2024ORAL ORDER re 131 Notice of Settlement in Principle and Stipulation and Order to Stay All Pending Deadlines - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is GRANTED. All deadlines are stayed until 3/29/2024. If this action is not dismissed by 3/29/2024, the parties shall file a joint status report on that date. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/28/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 02/28/2024)PACER Document
Sep 5, 2024ORAL ORDER REFERRING 137 MOTION to Stay, 134 MOTION to Enforce Settlement Agreement - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these motions are referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/5/2024. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(dlw) (Entered: 09/05/2024)PACER Document
Sep 5, 2024Remark: The parties should follow the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtesy Copies, a copy of which is found on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's webpage: https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/CJBCC2022.pdf (smg)PACER Document
Sep 5, 2024Remark: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (smg)PACER Document