IP Verse

Iot Innovations Llc V. Simplisafe, Inc. - 1:23-cv-10352

Explore the details of the Iot Innovations Llc V. Simplisafe, Inc. case under case number 1:23-cv-10352 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-10352
Filing Date
Feb 17, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
SimpliSafe, Inc. -
IOT Innovations LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Sep 22, 2023Joint MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement by IOT Innovations LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDonough, James) (Entered: 09/22/2023)PACER Document
Sep 25, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. 30-Day Settlement Order of Dismissal. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-10352-RGS, 1:23-cv-10520-RGS, 1:23-cv-10879-RGS. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 09/25/2023)PACER Document
Dec 29, 2023MEMORANDUM in Support re 51 Joint MOTION for Reconsideration re 50 Settlement Order of Dismissal filed by SimpliSafe, Inc.. (Bell, Cory) (Entered: 12/29/2023)PACER Document
Dec 29, 2023Joint MOTION for Reconsideration re 50 Settlement Order of Dismissal by SimpliSafe, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bell, Cory) (Entered: 12/29/2023)PACER Document
Jan 2, 2024Judge Richard G. Stearns: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 51 Joint Motion for Reconsideration re 50 Settlement Order of Dismissal. (Pacho, Arnold). Modified on 1/2/2024 to attach pdf. (Pacho, Arnold). (Entered: 01/02/2024)PACER Document
Feb 17, 2023ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) (Entered: 02/17/2023)PACER Document
Feb 28, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan Lloyd Hardt, and Carey Matthey Rozier. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 02/28/2023)PACER Document
Mar 6, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due 4/14/2023. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 03/06/2023)PACER Document
Mar 7, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Lionel M. Lavenue, Kara A. Specht, and Clinton P. Greub. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 03/07/2023)PACER Document
Apr 25, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. Case No. 23-cv-10352, Case No. 23-cv-10520, and Case No. 23-cv-10879 have been designated as related. Per L.R. 40.1(g)(1), cases are related only if "one or more of the following similarities exist: i. the cases involve the same or substantially similar issues of fact; ii. the cases arise out of the same occurrence, transaction or property; iii. the cases involve insurance coverage for the same property, transaction or occurrence." The parties are ordered to file briefs of no more than 5 pages by May 2, 2023 explaining how (if at all) these cases are related within the scope of L.R. 40.1(g)(1) and, if they are related, why these cases should proceed as separate actions rather than one consolidated action. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/25/2023)PACER Document
Apr 30, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying as moot 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of 25 Amended Complaint. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/30/2023)PACER Document
May 3, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Order of Consolidation. Case No. 23-cv-10352-RGS, 23-cv-10520-RGS, and 23-cv-10879-RGS are hereby consolidated. All further pleadings are to be filed in the lead case 23-cv-10352-RGS. Plaintiff is ordered to file a consolidated amended complaint within 14 days. Response is due 21 days thereafter. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-10352-RGS, 1:23-cv-10520-RGS, 1:23-cv-10879-RGS (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 05/03/2023)PACER Document
May 22, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re 31 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages. Given the due date for SimpliSafe's response to the Amended Consolidated Complaint, IOT Innovations shall file any opposition to the motion for leave to file excess pages by 5/29/2023. (RGS, law3) Modified on 5/23/2023. Notice regenerated to counsel. (Pacho, Arnold). (Entered: 05/22/2023)PACER Document
May 30, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part 31 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The parties may file briefs of no more than 30 pages each. To ensure that the parties have adequate room to fully address the legal issues in their briefs, the court will, in lieu of a fact section, allow the parties to separately attach as an exhibit a document providing technical background for the seventeen patents. The exhibit shall be no more than 15 pages total and will not count towards the page limit. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 05/30/2023)PACER Document
Jul 6, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 39 Motion for Extension of Time. SimpliSafe's Answer is due July 19, 2023. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 07/06/2023)PACER Document
Jul 19, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. An Answer having been filed, the court sets the following pretrial schedule:Initial disclosures to be exchanged by 8/18/2023. Preliminary infringement contentions to be served by 9/15/2023; non-infringement and invalidity contentions by 10/13/2023. Contentions may be amended and supplemented up to 30 days prior to the Markman hearing, and thereafter with the leave of court for good cause shown. The parties shall exchange terms and proposed constructions no later than 11/3/2023; conduct a meet and confer to finalize the list of terms to be construed by 11/10/2023; and submit a joint claim construction statement (ranking the terms in decreasing order of importance) to the court by 11/17/2023. Opening claim construction briefs to be filed by 12/22/2023; responsive briefs by 1/26/2024; replies (if any) by leave of court only. The court will schedule a Markman hearing at its convenience.Fact discovery to be completed by 5/10/2024. Opening expert reports to be exchanged by 6/14/2024; rebuttal reports by 7/19/2024; expert discovery closes 8/30/2024. Dispositive motions and Daubert motions to be filed by 9/27/2024; oppositions by 10/25/2024; replies (if any) by leave of court only. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 07/19/2023)PACER Document
Sep 6, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Order.Preliminary infringement contentions are due 9/15/2023; non-infringement and invalidity contentions are due 10/13/2023. Without leave of court, the parties are permitted to serve 30 interrogatories, 30 requests for admissions, and 30 document requests, to be served within fourteen (14) days of non-infringement and invalidity contentions (i.e., by 10/27/2023). The court expects responses to be made in thirty days, unless a request for additional time is granted. By 12/8/2023, plaintiff must select no more than 85 claims upon which to proceed (unless plaintiff shows good cause for allowing additional claims to be included, e.g., because they present distinct factual or legal issues). The parties shall exchange terms and proposed constructions no later than 12/22/2023; conduct a meet and confer to finalize the list of terms to be construed by 12/29/2023; and submit a joint claim construction statement (ranking the terms in decreasing order of importance) to the court by 1/5/2024. Opening claim construction briefs are to be filed by 1/26/2024; responsive briefs by 2/16/2024; replies (if any) by leave of court only. The court will schedule a Markman hearing at its convenience. Within fourteen (14) days of the courts claim construction ruling, plaintiff must further narrow its case to 51 claims (unless plaintiff shows good cause for allowing additional claims to be included, e.g., because they present distinct factual or legal issues).Fact discovery to be completed by 6/7/2024. Opening expert reports to be exchanged by 7/12/2024; rebuttal reports by 8/16/2024; expert discovery closes 9/27/2024. Within fourteen (14) days of expert discovery closing, plaintiff must further narrow its case to 17 claims (unless plaintiff shows good cause for allowing additional claims to be included, e.g., because they present distinct factual or legal issues).Dispositive motions and Daubert motions to be filed by 11/1/2024; oppositions by 11/22/2024; replies (if any) by leave of court only. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 09/06/2023)PACER Document
Sep 25, 2023Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part 48 Joint MOTION to Stay. The court will enter a 30-day Settlement Order of Dismissal. If the parties are unable to complete the settlement in 30 days, they should ask the court to extend the dismissal period. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 09/25/2023)PACER Document