IP Verse

Iqar Inc. V. Tesla, Inc. - 3:24-cv-01337

Explore the details of the Iqar Inc. V. Tesla, Inc. case under case number 3:24-cv-01337 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
3:24-cv-01337
Filing Date
Mar 6, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
IQAR Inc. -
Tesla Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Feb 9, 2024RESPONSE to Motion, filed by IQAR Inc., re 31 Sealed Motion filed filed by Defendant Tesla, Inc. (Siegmund, Mark) (Entered: 02/09/2024)PACER Document
Feb 16, 2024Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: # 1 Brief Reply In Support of Motion to Transfer Venue, # 2 Exhibit E, # 3 Exhibit F, # 4 Exhibit G, # 5 Exhibit I, # 6 Exhibit K, # 7 Proposed Order) (Kazi, Aamir) (Entered: 02/16/2024)PACER Document
Feb 16, 2024ATTACHMENT Public Exhibits to 52 Motion for leave to File Sealed Document by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H, # 2 Exhibit J, # 3 Exhibit L, # 4 Exhibit M, # 5 Exhibit N)(Kazi, Aamir) (Entered: 02/16/2024)PACER Document
Feb 20, 2024Text Order GRANTING 52 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Reply in Support of the Motion to Transfer, (Dkt. 52-1), and Exhibits E, F, G, I, and K, (Dkts. 52-2 through 52-6), under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tesla shall file an unsealed, redacted version of the Reply to the Motion to Transfer only on or before February 23, 2024. There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sslc)PACER Document
Feb 20, 2024Sealed Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue by Tesla, Inc. (dm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/21/2024: # 1 Public Exhibits) (dm). (Entered: 02/21/2024)PACER Document
Feb 23, 2024Redacted Copy of Reply In Support of Motion to Transfer Venue of 54 Sealed Document by Tesla, Inc.. (Kazi, Aamir) (Entered: 02/23/2024)PACER Document
Feb 23, 2024Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Brief SEALED DOCUMENT_Motion for Leave File Sur-Reply, # 3 Exhibit A - SEALED DOCUMENT, # 4 Exhibit B - Proposed Order Granting Opposed Mot. to Leave to File Sur-Replu) (Siegmund, Mark) (Entered: 02/23/2024)PACER Document
Mar 1, 2024Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: # 1 SEALED DOCUMENT, # 2 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to File Sur-Reply, # 3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to SEAL) (Kazi, Aamir) (Entered: 03/01/2024)PACER Document
Mar 1, 2024Case reassigned to Judge Robert Pitman. Judge Docket II - Austin no longer assigned to the case. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dm)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Text Order GRANTING 56 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file iQar's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply, (Dkt. 56-2), Exhibit A, (Dkt. 56-3), and the proposed order, (Dkt. 56-4), under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that iQar shall file an unsealed, redacted version of the Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply only on or before March 6, 2024. There is no need to file a redacted exhibit or proposed order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sslc)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Text Order GRANTING 57 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file Tesla's Response in Opposition to iQar's Opposed Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply, (Dkt. 57-1), and the proposed order, (Dkt. 57-2), under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tesla shall file an unsealed, redacted version of the response only on or before March 6, 2024. There is no need to file a redacted proposed order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sslc)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Tesla, Inc.'s Reply in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue. (dm) (Entered: 03/04/2024)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Sealed Response in Opposition to 58 Iqar's Opposed Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Tesla, Inc.'s Reply in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue. (dm) (Entered: 03/04/2024)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024ORDER DENYING 58 Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; GRANTING 31 Sealed Motion to Transfer Venue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) (Entered: 03/04/2024)PACER Document
Mar 4, 2024Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (dm) (Entered: 03/05/2024)PACER Document
Mar 22, 2024CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2024) (Entered: 03/22/2024)PACER Document
Mar 28, 2024REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing according to Judge Chhabria's available dates, which are listed on his webpage under the section "Scheduling Notes." The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2024 at 10:00 AM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at [email protected] no later than Friday, May 31, 2024, by no later than 12:00PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024) (Entered: 03/28/2024)PACER Document
May 13, 2024CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING 5/16/2024 MOTION HEARING RE 70 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review of the Asserted Patents. The Court will issue a written ruling based on the motion and responsive briefs. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2024) (Entered: 05/13/2024)PACER Document
Nov 8, 2023Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Kristina DiBenedetto McKenna by IQAR Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Siegmund, Mark) (Entered: 11/08/2023)Attachment