IP Verse

Koji Ip, Llc V. Guru Wireless, Inc. - 2:24-cv-03713

Explore the details of the Koji Ip, Llc V. Guru Wireless, Inc. case under case number 2:24-cv-03713 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-03713
Filing Date
May 3, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Koji IP, LLC -
Guru Wireless, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Sep 18, 2024ORDER TO FILE JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT AND TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties shall file their overdue Rule 26(f) report no later than 12 p.m. on September 19, 2024. Additionally, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than September 25, 2024, why its claims should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 09/18/2024)PACER Document
Sep 18, 2024NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew J Hawkinson on behalf of Counter Claimant Guru Wireless, Inc., Defendant Guru Wireless, Inc. (Attorney Matthew J Hawkinson added to party Guru Wireless, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Matthew J Hawkinson added to party Guru Wireless, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hawkinson, Matthew) (Entered: 09/18/2024)PACER Document
Sep 18, 2024NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Guru Wireless, Inc., (Yang, David) (Entered: 09/18/2024)PACER Document
Sep 18, 2024ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against Koji IP, LLC filed by Defendant Guru Wireless, Inc..(Attorney David C Yang added to party Guru Wireless, Inc.(pty:dft))(Yang, David) (Entered: 09/18/2024)PACER Document
Sep 19, 2024RULE 26(F) REPORT REPORT filed by Counter Defendant Koji IP, LLC, Plaintiff Koji IP, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 09/19/2024)PACER Document
Sep 20, 2024ORDER TO REFILE JOINT 26(F) REPORT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties are ordered to meet and confer and file a report that strictly complies with the Court's MSC order by noon on September 23, 2024. The Court reminds the parties that further failures to comply with its orders may result in an order to show cause re sanctionsand the parties should be prepared to address this issue at the MSC. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 09/20/2024)PACER Document
Sep 20, 2024REQUEST for Leave of Susan S.Q. Kalra to Appear for Telephonic Appearance for MSC filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLC. Request set for hearing on 9/27/2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Susan S.Q. Kalra, # 2 Proposed Order) (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 09/20/2024)PACER Document
Sep 23, 2024RULE 26(F) REPORT REPORT filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLC, Counter Defendant Koji IP, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 09/23/2024)PACER Document
Sep 25, 2024RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLCto Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 27 Response to Order to Show Cause (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 09/25/2024)PACER Document
Sep 27, 2024CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Amended Pleadings due by 11/29/2024. Discovery cut-off 2/21/2025. Motions due by 2/28/2025. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 3/14/2025. Jury Trial set for 5/5/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Pretrial Conference set for 4/25/2025 09:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Conference set for 3/28/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 09/27/2024)PACER Document
Sep 27, 2024ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (lfa) (Entered: 09/27/2024)PACER Document
Sep 27, 2024PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (lfa) (Entered: 09/27/2024)PACER Document
Sep 27, 2024MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Held and completed) held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Case called and appearances made. On September 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why its claims should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, after Defendant failed to timely answer and Plaintiff failed to seek entry of default. Dkt. No. 19. Defendant filed its answer soon after. In response to the order to show cause (OSC), Plaintiff stated that it chose not to pursue action against Defendant due to ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 28. The Court discharges the OSC but admonishes the parties that future violations of the Court's orders may result in sanctions. Should the Court issue an OSC in these proceedings in the future, the parties are required to disclose the Court's verbal admonishment. The Court heard from the parties about the contents of their joint Rule 26(f) report. A case management order will be issued separately. The Court sets a status conference for October 4, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. The parties shall meet and confer promptly to discuss their understanding of whether Defendant has commercially marketed or sold any allegedly infringing products. By 9:00 a.m. on October 3, the parties shall submit a joint report on the status of potential resolution in this matter. (see document for further details) Court Reporter: CourtSmart. (bm) (Entered: 09/30/2024)PACER Document
Oct 2, 2024REPORT filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 10/02/2024)PACER Document
Oct 2, 2024Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Koji IP, LLC.(Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 10/02/2024)PACER Document
Oct 11, 2024REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024)PACER Document
Sep 23, 2024(In Chambers) Order by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties failed to file a joint Rule 26(f) report, as ordered, in advance of the mandatory scheduling conference (MSC). The Court issued another order requiring the parties to file the overdue report and directing Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The parties filed a noncompliant report, requiring the Court to issue yet another order. Now, Plaintiff's counsel has requested to appear remotely at the MSC because of transportation issues. The Court intends to address the parties in person, and plaintiff's counsel has not demonstrated that she is unable to find another form of transportation to attend the MSC in person. The Court therefore denies the request for lack of good cause. At the MSC, the parties also should be prepared to address their failure to comply with court orders. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lfa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/23/2024)PACER Document
Sep 30, 2024TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Mircheff for settlement. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Mircheff's clerk, Christianna Howard at [email protected]. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge, BUT NOT BEFORE THE PARTIES HAVE ENGAGED IN SUFFICIENT DISCUSSIONS TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MEANINGFUL. In general, the parties should contact the court clerk at least 30 days prior to the date on which they wish to hold the settlement conference. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 29 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/30/2024)PACER Document