IP Verse

Missed Call, Llc V. Freshworks Inc. - 1:23-cv-02913

Explore the details of the Missed Call, Llc V. Freshworks Inc. case under case number 1:23-cv-02913 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-02913
Filing Date
Nov 3, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Missed Call, LLC -
FreshWorks Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Feb 7, 2024ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/7/2024, re: 32 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to 25 motion to dismiss by February 19, 2024. Text Only Entry(pabsec, ) (Entered: 02/07/2024)PACER Document
Feb 7, 2024MOTION for Discovery Motion for Venue Discovery by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Ramey, William) (Entered: 02/07/2024)Attachment
Feb 7, 2024MOTION for Discovery Motion for Venue Discovery by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Ramey, William) (Entered: 02/07/2024)Attachment
Feb 7, 2024MOTION for Discovery Motion for Venue Discovery by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Ramey, William) (Entered: 02/07/2024)Attachment
Feb 7, 2024MEMORANDUM regarding 34 MOTION for Discovery Motion for Venue Discovery filed by Missed Call, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/07/2024. Text Only Entry (pabsec, ) (Entered: 02/07/2024)PACER Document
Feb 15, 2024Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests by Defendant FreshWorks Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Mann, Rex) (Entered: 02/15/2024)Attachment
Feb 15, 2024MEMORANDUM regarding 36 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests filed by FreshWorks Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (Entered: 02/15/2024)PACER Document
Feb 16, 2024ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/16/2024, terminating 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Venue Discovery. The motion (a) does not certify conferral (see LR 7.1(a)); (b) is unnecessary, as the parties have already had their Rule 26(f) meeting, and the court entered a scheduling order allowing fact discovery; and (c) improperly files discovery requests before they are "used in the proceeding." Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(A). Nor is this motion necessary to alert the court that Plaintiff intends to oppose Defendant's motion to transfer, as Plaintiff already has an opportunity to file a response under D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d). Text Only Entry (sbplc1) (Entered: 02/16/2024)PACER Document
Feb 16, 2024ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/16/2024, granting in part and denying in part 36 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests. Defendant's motion to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff's venue discovery requests is granted; the responses are due 3/22/2024. However, the motion is denied to the extent it implies approval of the parties' agreement to extend Plaintiff's deadline to respond to the motion (ECF No. 27) to transfer. The motion to transfer is not referred to this court, and this District does not recognize parties' stipulations to extend deadlines except as provided in D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1. Plaintiff should file an unopposed motion to extend its deadline to respond to the motion to transfer. Text Only Entry (sbplc1) (Entered: 02/16/2024)PACER Document
Feb 19, 2024STRICKEN RESPONSE to 25 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter filed by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Ramey, William) Modified on 2/20/2024 to strike pursuant to 42 Order. (jtorr, ). (Entered: 02/19/2024)PACER Document
Feb 19, 2024STRICKEN RESPONSE to 25 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter filed by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Ramey, William) Modified on 2/20/2024 to strike pursuant to 42 Order. (jtorr, ). (Entered: 02/19/2024)Attachment
Feb 20, 2024ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: 40 Response to Motion filed by attorney William P. Ramey, III. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/ followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all documents.(Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) (Entered: 02/20/2024)PACER Document
Feb 20, 2024ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/20/2024. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant, Freshworks, Inc.'s 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter [ 40 ] is STRICKEN for failure to comply with § III.A of this Court's Practice Standards ("All... responses... shall not exceed fifteen pages.... These page limitations include... [the] signature block, and all other matters, except the certificate of service."). Plaintiff shall file a response that complies with the Court's Practice Standards on or before February 21, 2024. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) (Entered: 02/20/2024)PACER Document
Feb 20, 2024RESPONSE to 25 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter filed by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Denying Motion to Dismiss)(Ramey, William) (Entered: 02/20/2024)PACER Document
Feb 20, 2024RESPONSE to 25 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter filed by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Denying Motion to Dismiss)(Ramey, William) (Entered: 02/20/2024)Attachment
Mar 5, 2024REPLY to Response to 25 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter filed by Defendant FreshWorks Inc.. (Mann, Rex) (Entered: 03/05/2024)PACER Document
Mar 19, 2024BRIEF in Support of 27 MOTION to Transfer Case and Notice of No Opposition filed by Defendant FreshWorks Inc.. (Mann, Rex) (Entered: 03/19/2024)PACER Document
Mar 21, 2024NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Missed Call, LLC (Ramey, William) (Entered: 03/21/2024)PACER Document
Mar 21, 2024Civil Case Terminated pursuant to 46 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed in this case. Text Only Entry (dgumb, ) (Entered: 03/21/2024)PACER Document
Mar 21, 2024Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the determination of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (dgumb, ) (Entered: 03/25/2024)PACER Document