IP Verse

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. V. Vizio, Inc. - 2:23-cv-00124

Explore the details of the Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. V. Vizio, Inc. case under case number 2:23-cv-00124 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:23-cv-00124
Filing Date
Mar 24, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. -
Jane Du -
Vizio, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 20, 2024USCA ORDER (KLC) (Entered: 08/23/2024)PACER Document
Aug 26, 2024JOINT MOTION to Stay Pending Decision on VIZIO, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) by Vizio, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hartsell, Steven) (Entered: 08/26/2024)PACER Document
Mar 27, 2023Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )PACER Document
Mar 27, 2023In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )PACER Document
Apr 12, 2023Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Vizio, Inc. to 5/17/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )PACER Document
May 1, 2023Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Vizio, Inc. to 6/1/2023. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )PACER Document
Jul 20, 2023Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 7/20/2023. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether they consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court then gave counsel Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter Shawn McRoberts) (aeb)PACER Document
Apr 26, 2024***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 68, SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (NKL)PACER Document
Jun 4, 2024NOTICE of Hearing:Markman Hearing RESET for 8/27/2024 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga)PACER Document
Jun 26, 2024***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 88, REPLY to Response to Motion. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (NKL)PACER Document
Jan 22, 2025ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 113 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s) 113 terminated). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/22/2025. (NKL)PACER Document