IP Verse

Municipal Parking Services Inc V. Clancy Systems Inc - 1:24-cv-01581

Explore the details of the Municipal Parking Services Inc V. Clancy Systems Inc case under case number 1:24-cv-01581 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-01581
Filing Date
Jun 6, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Municipal Parking Services Inc -
Clancy Systems, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 6, 2024CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Wasserman, Emily) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (efoga, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/06/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024NOTICE Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding A Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Municipal Parking Services Inc (Wasserman, Emily) (Entered: 06/06/2024)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2024SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)Attachment
Oct 11, 2024 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING EX PARTE REEXAMINATION(ECF No. 15 ) Considering all the relevant factors, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court concludes that a stay pending the USPTO's EPR of the Asserted Patents is appropriate. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination, ECF No. 15 , is GRANTED. This case is STAYED until further Order of Court. The Parties shall jointly file a Status Report with the Court within seven days of the conclusion of the EPR. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/11/2024.(norlin, )PACER Document