IP Verse

Nickey V. U.S. Department Of Transportation - 1:24-cv-03253

Explore the details of the Nickey V. U.S. Department Of Transportation case under case number 1:24-cv-03253 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-03253
Filing Date
Nov 18, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Civil Rights: Other

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -
JUSTIN MICHAEL NICKEY -
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION -
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY -
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE -
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Dec 3, 2024AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE with Jury Demand filed by JUSTIN MICHAEL NICKEY.(mg) (Entered: 12/06/2024)PACER Document
Jan 27, 2025NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Stratton on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Stratton, Kimberly) (Entered: 01/27/2025)PACER Document
Feb 3, 2025MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. (Stratton, Kimberly) (Entered: 02/03/2025)PACER Document
Nov 18, 2024SUMMONS Not Issued as to All Defendants (mg)PACER Document
Dec 3, 2024SUMMONS (7) Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zdp)PACER Document
Jan 21, 2025MINUTE ORDER. The plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 18, 2024. As of the date of this order, the public docket reflects that the plaintiff has yet to file proof of service on any defendant. The Court directs the plaintiff's attention to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which provides in pertinent part that if a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the Court, on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff, must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the Court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l)(1). To avoid the finality of a mandatory dismissal of this action against the defendants, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff must, on or before February 16, 2025, either cause process to be served upon the defendants and proof of service to be filed with the Court or establish good cause for the failure to do so. The failure to make such filings will result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this minute order to the plaintiffs address of record. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 21, 2025. (lcdlf1)PACER Document
Jan 21, 2025Set/Reset Deadlines: Time to effectuate service upon party due by 2/16/2025. (zjch, )PACER Document
Feb 3, 2025MINUTE ORDER granting the defendants' first 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Under Rule 6(b)(1)(A), "the court may, for good cause, extend the time" for a party to respond to a motion when the request for additional time is made "before the original time or its extension expires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). In light of the defendants' representation that counsel needs time to collect relevant background information from five federal agencies and meet with agency counsel, the Court finds that "good cause" exists for delay in this case. According, the defendants' 6 Motion is GRANTED; and the defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before March 25, 2025. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 3, 2025. (lcdlf1)PACER Document
Feb 3, 2025Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 3/25/2025, (zjch, )PACER Document
Nov 18, 2024COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 208575) filed by JUSTIN MICHAEL NICKEY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) (Entered: 11/20/2024)Attachment
Nov 18, 2024COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 208575) filed by JUSTIN MICHAEL NICKEY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) (Entered: 11/20/2024)Attachment