Stay informed with the latest litigation news. Explore now

IP Verse

Omnivision Technologies, Inc. V. Re Secured Networks, Llc - 1:24-cv-00187

Explore the details of the Omnivision Technologies, Inc. V. Re Secured Networks, Llc case under case number 1:24-cv-00187 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-00187
Filing Date
Feb 12, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
OmniVision Technologies, Inc. -
RE Secured Networks, LLC -

Patents Involved

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 8, 2025MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Amanda Sewanan - filed by RE Secured Networks, LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Siew, Jennifer) (Entered: 08/08/2025)PACER Document
Aug 12, 2025NOTICE of Appearance by Noelle Briana Torrice on behalf of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (Torrice, Noelle) (Entered: 08/12/2025)PACER Document
Aug 4, 2025Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Robert S. Pickens. ( re 103 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Robert S. Pickens )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4750495).(Siew, Jennifer) (Entered: 08/04/2025)PACER Document
Aug 7, 2025SO ORDERED, D.I. 103 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Robert S. Pickens - filed by RE Secured Networks, LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 08/07/2025. (sam)PACER Document
Aug 8, 2025Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Amanda Sewanan. ( re 107 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Amanda Sewanan )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4755228).(Siew, Jennifer) (Entered: 08/08/2025)PACER Document
Aug 8, 2025SO ORDERED, D.I. 107 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Amanda Sewanan - filed by RE Secured Networks, LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 08/08/2025. (sam)PACER Document
Aug 11, 2025Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Markman Hearing held on 8/11/2025. The Court heard argument from the parties regarding certain of the disputed terms. (D.I. 87 ; D.I. 91 ) The Court took the matter under advisement. (Clerk: E. Rose; Court reporter: Stacy Ingram) Appearances: D. Bluestone, K. Lynch, C. Hemphill and K. Cramer for Plaintiff; A. Gaza, T. Gilman, A. Sewanan and J. Siew for Defendant. (sam) Modified on 8/13/2025 (sam).PACER Document
Aug 13, 2025Pro Hac Vice Attorney Robert S. Pickens for RE Secured Networks, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)PACER Document
Aug 14, 2025ORAL ORDER: During the August 11, 2025 Markman hearing in this case, the Court discussed with the parties how the parties’ pre-hearing work did not sufficiently identify and tee up the core claim construction disputes as to a number of the terms at issue (exacerbated by RE Secured Networks’ failure to clearly articulate its proposed claim constructions for certain terms in writing during the briefing process)—and how this led to an inefficient Markman hearing and a waste of judicial resources. In light of that, and in line with the Court’s comments during the hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) As to terms 2 and 4, the parties (including outside counsel and Delaware counsel) shall further meet and confer to ensure that they have a full and complete understanding of all aspects of the relevant claim construction and/or definiteness disputes between them, including as to whether any joint resolution as to those terms can be reached. After further meeting and conferring, if the parties believe that a material dispute still remains as to these terms and the terms require construction, then by no later than 21 days prior to the summary judgment motion filing deadline, the parties should advise the Court of this. The parties should also then let the Court know whether terms 2 and/or 4 are expected to be relevant to any issues that will be raised in the forthcoming summary judgment briefing. Thereafter, if needed, the Court will set out a further process for resolving any remaining claim construction disputes regarding those terms.; (2) As to term 3, by no later than August 25, 2025, the parties shall provide to the Court a joint letter as discussed during the hearing, which advises whether they have agreed on a proposed construction for the term (and if so, what is it), or whether a dispute remains.; (3) The Court will be able to resolve the parties’ claim construction disputes as to term 1, and will do so as soon as practicable.; and (4) As to terms 5-7, in part due to the at times confusing nature of the Markman briefing, in part because the Court was not able to hear argument on these terms during the hearing, and in part because the Court is concerned that (in light of what occurred during the hearing) the briefing on the terms may not be fully representative of each side’s position, the Court declines to construe these terms at this stage. The parties should also further meet and confer about their disputes regarding terms 5-7. If any disputes remain as to those terms, the parties should follow the instructions set forth above and advise the Court of any such remaining disputes no later than 21 days prior to the summary judgment motion filing deadline. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 08/14/2025. (sam) (Entered: 08/14/2025)PACER Document
Aug 14, 2025Pro Hac Vice Attorney Amanda Sewanan for RE Secured Networks, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)PACER Document
Aug 15, 2025Pro Hac Vice Attorney Kathleen M. Lynch for OmniVision Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)PACER Document
Aug 15, 2025Pro Hac Vice Attorney Carlton J. Hemphill for OmniVision Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)PACER Document