IP Verse

Ontel Products Corporation V. Equity Brands Llc - 1:24-cv-02373

Explore the details of the Ontel Products Corporation V. Equity Brands Llc case under case number 1:24-cv-02373 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-02373
Filing Date
Mar 28, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Ontel Products Corporation -
Equity Brands LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 23, 2024 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...The parties are apprised that the Court retains discretion as to whether to afford confidential treatment in its opinions a nd orders to information the parties have redacted, sealed, or designated as confidential. The Court retains the discretion to allow disclosure of any subject covered by this stipulation or to modify this stipulation at any time in the interest of justice. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 8/23/2024) (ks)PACER Document
Jul 1, 2025 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised at ECF No. 47 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without pre judice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereaf ter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submi t the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per the Courts Individual Rule No. 7, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 7/1/2025) (jca)PACER Document