IP Verse

Optimorphix, Inc. V. Oracle Corporation - 1:23-cv-01249

Explore the details of the Optimorphix, Inc. V. Oracle Corporation case under case number 1:23-cv-01249 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-01249
Filing Date
Nov 1, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
OptiMorphix, Inc. -
Oracle Corporation -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jan 23, 2024Pro Hac Vice Attorney Diana M. Rutowski for Oracle Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)PACER Document
Jan 24, 2024Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Dorian S. Berger, Daniel P. Hipskind, and Erin McCracken. ( re 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Dorian S. Berger, Daniel P. Hipskind, and Erin McCracken )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4321549).(Brauerman, Stephen) (Entered: 01/24/2024)PACER Document
Jan 24, 2024SO ORDERED re 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Dorian S. Berger, Daniel P. Hipskind, and Erin McCracken filed by OptiMorphix, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/24/2024. (dlw)PACER Document
Jan 29, 2024Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael C. Chow for Oracle Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)PACER Document
Feb 12, 2024STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant Oracle Corporation to file a reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (D.I. 8) to February 22, 2024 - filed by Oracle Corporation. (Keller, Karen) (Entered: 02/12/2024)PACER Document
Feb 22, 2024REPLY BRIEF re 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Oracle Corporation. (Keller, Karen) (Entered: 02/22/2024)PACER Document
May 1, 2024STIPULATION Stay by OptiMorphix, Inc.. (Golden, Ronald) (Entered: 05/01/2024)PACER Document