Explore the details of the Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd. V. Optimum Imaging Technologies Llc case under case number 4:24-cv-00847 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.
The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.
| Name | Represented By |
|---|---|
| Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd. | - |
| Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC | - |
Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.
The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.
| Date | Docket Entry | Type |
|---|---|---|
Set alerts for critical docket entry | ||
| Sep 12, 2024 | Letter from Joseph M. Casino, Counsel for Plaintiff Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd. Responding to Tentative Order Granting Transfer. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-E)(Casino, Joseph) (Filed on 9/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/24/2024.] (Entered: 09/12/2024) | PACER Document |
| Sep 12, 2024 | RESPONSE re 42 Order (Defendant's Answer to Court's Questions in Lieu of Hearing) by Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC. (Harkins, Robert) (Filed on 9/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/24/2024.] (Entered: 09/12/2024) | PACER Document |
| Sep 12, 2024 | RESPONSE re 44 Response ( Non Motion ) by Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd.. (Casino, Joseph) (Filed on 9/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/24/2024.] (Entered: 09/12/2024) | PACER Document |
| Sep 12, 2024 | ORDER 21 ORDER by Judge Trina L. Thompson vacating the hearing re [ECF No. 12]. The court takes this matter under submission. The court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. (By rule or order, the court may provide for submitting and determining motions on briefs, without opposition and without oral hearings.); L. R. 7(1)(b) (authorizing courts to dispense with oral argument on any motion except where an oral hearing is required by statute). The hearing scheduled for September 17, 2024, is hereby vacated. The court ordered the parties to respond to the Court's questions and that the responses shall not exceed three pages. The Court did not give the parties leave to file additional attachments or additional replies. These items may be stricken. (See, ECF 42, page 2). Signed by Judge Trina L. Thompson on 9/12/24. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Thompson, Trina) (Filed on 9/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/24/2024.] (Entered: 09/12/2024) | PACER Document |
| Sep 23, 2024 | *** Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas *** (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/24/2024.] | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Notified Attorney for Plaintiff, Joseph M. Casino, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. JOSEPH M. CASINO NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THE USDC EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - EMAILED ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Notified Attorney for Plaintiff, Michael J. Kasdan, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. MICHAEL J. KASHDEN NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THE USDC EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - EMAILED ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Notified Attorney for Plaintiff, Sean W. Vallancourt, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. SEAN W. VALLANCOURT NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THE USDC EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - EMAILED ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Notified Attorney for Plaintiff, Thomas Landman, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. THOMAS LANDMAN NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THE USDC EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - EMAILED ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Notified Attorney for Plaintiff, Jamie L. Dupree, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. JAMIE L. DUPREE NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THE USDC EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - EMAILED ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER (baf) | PACER Document |
| Sep 25, 2024 | In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf) | PACER Document |
| Dec 10, 2024 | MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Dkt. # 53 ) is hereby GRANTED. (Motion(s) 53 terminated). Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/10/2024. (jmb) | PACER Document |