IP Verse

Precision Point Devices Llc V. Asus Computer International - 3:22-cv-08298

Explore the details of the Precision Point Devices Llc V. Asus Computer International case under case number 3:22-cv-08298 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
3:22-cv-08298
Filing Date
Dec 13, 2022
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Precision Point Devices LLC -
ASUS Computer International -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Mar 31, 2023ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options by ASUS (Joshi, Vinay) (Filed on 3/31/2023) (Entered: 03/31/2023)PACER Document
Apr 10, 2023MOTION to Dismiss Complaint under 35 USC Section 101 filed by ASUS Computer International. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 4/24/2023. Replies due by 5/1/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Joshi, Vinay) (Filed on 4/10/2023) (Entered: 04/10/2023)PACER Document
Dec 14, 2022Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/28/2022. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2022) (Entered: 12/14/2022)PACER Document
Jan 19, 2023CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/2/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. T here is no document associated with this entry.) (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2023) (Entered: 01/19/2023)PACER Document
Feb 15, 2023SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/1/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2023) (Entered: 02/15/2023)PACER Document
Feb 27, 2023CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2023) (Entered: 02/27/2023)PACER Document
Mar 29, 2023ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2023) (Entered: 03/29/2023)PACER Document