IP Verse

Preservation Technologies Llc V. Forbes Media Llc - 1:23-cv-10609

Explore the details of the Preservation Technologies Llc V. Forbes Media Llc case under case number 1:23-cv-10609 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-10609
Filing Date
Dec 5, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Preservation Technologies LLC -
Forbes Media LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jan 22, 2024 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED in part. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for February 2, 2024 is adjourned to February 9, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in in Courtro om 443 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, 10007. The parties' joint letter must be filed no later than February 1, 2024. For the required contents of the joint letter, the parties are directed to Dkt. 12. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 2/9/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/22/2024) (tg)PACER Document
Jan 22, 2024 MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying 21 Motion re: 21 MOTION Unopposed Letter Motion to Relate Cases . ENDORSEMENT: Application DENIED. Rule 13 of the Rules for the Division of Business Among District Court Judges in the Southern District of New York states that in determining relatedness, a judge will consider whether the actions involve "substantially similar parties." Although Forbes and TIME are both media companies, they are still different defendants. As such, the Motion to regard the TIME Action as related and to transfer to the Undersigned is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/22/2024) (tg)PACER Document
Feb 9, 2024 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's response to the Complaint must be filed no later than February 16, 2024. Plaintiff's deadline to respond or amend the Complaint as of right is March 15, 2024. If Plaintiff elects to respond, Defendant's deadline for the reply is March 29, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery is STAYED pending resolution of Defendants anticipated Motion to Dismiss. SO ORDERED. Forbes Media LLC answer due 2/16/2024.( Amended Pleadings due by 3/15/2024., Replies due by 3/29/2024., Responses due by 3/15/2024) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 2/9/2024) (tg)PACER Document
Mar 18, 2024 ORDER: denying as moot 32 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a redlined version of the amended complaint no later than March 20, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot in light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motion at Dkt. 32. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 3/18/2024) (ama)PACER Document
Apr 15, 2024 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines are CANCELLED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs (including attorneys' fees) to either party. The Clerk o f Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions and to CLOSE the case. Within 30 days of this order, the parties may apply to reopen this case. Any such application must show good cause for holding the case open in light of the parties ' settlement and must be filed within 30 days. Any request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied solely on that basis. Additionally, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlem ent agreement, they must submit within the same 30-day period: (1) their settlement agreement to the Court in accordance with Rule 7.A of the Court's Individual Practices and (2) a request that the Court issue an order expressly retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354 (2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 4/15/2024) (tg)PACER Document