IP Verse

R Corp. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A - 1:2025cv06337

Explore the details of the R Corp. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A case under case number 1:2025cv06337 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:2025cv06337
Filing Date
Jun 6, 2025
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
OPEN
Case Link
View Case
Nature of Suit
830

Plaintiffs

The following plaintiffs are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

CompanyRepresented By
R Corp.
Flener IP and Business Law

Defendants

The following defendants are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

CompanyRepresented By
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 9, 2025MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (gmm, ) (Entered: 06/09/2025)MAILED
Jun 9, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 06/09/2025)MINUTE
Jun 6, 2025SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff R Corp. Unreadcted Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)SEALED DOCUMENT
Jun 6, 2025MOTION by Plaintiff R Corp. for leave to file documents under seal (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)MOTION
Jun 6, 2025ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff R Corp. by James Edward Judge (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)ATTORNEY
Jun 6, 2025CIVIL Cover Sheet (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)CIVIL
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)COMPLAINT