IP Verse

R Corp. V. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified In Schedule A - 1:25cv06337

Explore the details of the R Corp. V. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified In Schedule A case under case number 1:25cv06337 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:25cv06337
Filing Date
Jun 6, 2025
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Case Link
View Case
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
R Corp. -
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 6, 2025MOTION by Plaintiff R Corp. for leave to file documents under seal (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025CIVIL Cover Sheet (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff R Corp. by James Edward Judge (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff R Corp. Unreadcted Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)Attachment
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)Attachment
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)Attachment
Jun 6, 2025COMPLAINT filed by R Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23588978. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/06/2025)Attachment
Jun 6, 2025CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (txd, )PACER Document
Jun 6, 2025CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (txd, )PACER Document
Jun 9, 2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 06/09/2025)PACER Document
Jun 9, 2025MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (gmm, ) (Entered: 06/09/2025)PACER Document