IP Verse

Speir Technologies Ltd. V. Apple Inc. - 5:23-cv-00095

Explore the details of the Speir Technologies Ltd. V. Apple Inc. case under case number 5:23-cv-00095 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
5:23-cv-00095
Filing Date
Jan 9, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Speir Technologies LTD -
Apple, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Mar 30, 2023ORDER Granting 81 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/30/2023. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2023) (Entered: 03/30/2023)PACER Document
Jan 9, 2023Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/14/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2023) Modified on 1/11/2023 (wsn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/09/2023)PACER Document
Jan 9, 2023Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright cc: form mailed to register. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2023) Modified on 1/9/2023 (msr, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/11/2023 (wsn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/09/2023)PACER Document
Jan 24, 2023CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023) (Entered: 01/24/2023)PACER Document
Jan 27, 2023CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/10/2023. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2023) (Entered: 01/27/2023)PACER Document
Jan 30, 2023CLERK'S NOTICE: Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case as referral Judge re 78 Order of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi has randomly been assigned as Magistrate Judge. Please note this is This is a text entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023) (Entered: 01/30/2023)PACER Document
Mar 3, 2023Electronic filing error. Document not properly linked. [err102]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. In future add corporate entities, or other affiliates to docket. Re: 89 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Speir Technologies LTD (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2023)PACER Document
Mar 20, 2023CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING HEARING. Initial Case Management set for 3/23/2023 is Continued to 3/30/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2023) (Entered: 03/20/2023)PACER Document
Mar 30, 2023Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward J. Davila: Motion Hearing held on 3/30/2023 re 81 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. The Court found it appropriate to grant the stay to allow the inter partes review to go forward. See Order at ECF No. 92 . Plaintiff Attorney: Brett cooper, Jennifer Estremera. Defendant Attorney: Jim Batchelder. Total Time in Court: 27 min (9:08-9:35 AM). Court Reporter: Irene Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/30/2023) (Entered: 03/30/2023)PACER Document
May 19, 2023STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Partes Review Petitions by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Starchenko, Stepan) (Filed on 5/19/2023) (Entered: 05/19/2023)PACER Document
May 25, 2023STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Partes Review Petitions by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Starchenko, Stepan) (Filed on 5/25/2023) (Entered: 05/25/2023)PACER Document
Jun 13, 2023STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Partes Review Petitions by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Starchenko, Stepan) (Filed on 6/13/2023) (Entered: 06/13/2023)PACER Document
Aug 14, 2023STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Parties Review Petitions by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Starchenko, Stepan) (Filed on 8/14/2023) (Entered: 08/14/2023)PACER Document
Aug 24, 2023STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Parties Review Petitions by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Starchenko, Stepan) (Filed on 8/24/2023) (Entered: 08/24/2023)PACER Document