IP Verse

Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. V. Albanese - 1:23-cv-07691

Explore the details of the Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. V. Albanese case under case number 1:23-cv-07691 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-07691
Filing Date
Oct 16, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Lindsay Albanese -
Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. -
Hats On LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Oct 16, 2023Proposed Summons. Re 1 Complaint,, by Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhang, Jiyuan) (Entered: 10/16/2023)PACER Document
Oct 16, 2023Corporate Disclosure Statement by Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhang, Jiyuan) (Entered: 10/16/2023)PACER Document
Oct 16, 2023COMPLAINT against Lindsay Albanese, Hats On LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17184809 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit 1. 047 Patent, # 3 Exhibit 2. Complaint dated 05102023, # 4 Exhibit 3. Complaint dated 09282023, # 5 Exhibit 4. Product for sale, # 6 Exhibit 5. Non-infringement analysis, # 7 Exhibit 6. Amazon's email dated 06132023) (Zhang, Jiyuan) (Entered: 10/16/2023)PACER Document
Oct 16, 2023AFFIDAVIT of Service for AO 120 Report re Patent served on Jiyuan Zhang on 10/16/2023, filed by Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd.. (Zhang, Jiyuan) (Entered: 10/16/2023)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) (Entered: 10/17/2023)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) (Entered: 10/17/2023)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023Proposed Summons. by Shenzhen City Sanhu Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhang, Jiyuan) (Entered: 10/17/2023)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No name and address on the Plaintiffs attorney name and addresses section. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 10/25/23 why this case should not be dismissed or transferred for improper venue. Other than the location of the office of plaintiff's counsel, this case appears to have no connection with the Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleges venue is proper here "because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this district," but defendant's sales into New York have nothing to do with plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff's complaint, rather, alleges defendant's misconduct is contacting Amazon to claim that plaintiff is infringing. That contact between defendant and Amazon occurred in California, where defendant has its business, not in New York. California is thus the venue where "a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred," not the Eastern District of New York. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/17/2023. (PW)PACER Document
Oct 31, 2023 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, and Case transferred to District of Central District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE.. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023 ) (RG)PACER Document