IP Verse

Signify Holding B.V. V. Atomi, Inc. - 1:24-cv-08353

Signify Holding B.V. V. Atomi, Inc. (Case No. 1:24-cv-08353), filed on Nov 1, 2024 in the District Court, S.D. New York involving patent infringement. This case involves patent infringement claims between the parties. Explore details about the litigants, key filings, and major docket updates.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-08353
Filing Date
Nov 1, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Atomi, Inc. -
Signify Holding B.V. -

Patents Involved

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Nov 1, 2024COMPLAINT against Atomi, Inc.. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,961, # 2 Exhibit 2. U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,591, # 3 Exhibit 3. U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,414, # 4 Exhibit 4. U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,497, # 5 Exhibit 5. U.S. Pat. No. RE49,320, # 6 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. No. 7,802,902, # 7 Exhibit 7. U.S. Pat. No. 9,188,318, # 8 Exhibit 8. U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,907, # 9 Exhibit 9. TM1814 Titan Micro Datasheet, # 10 Exhibit 10. V433 Schematic).(McArdle, Christopher) (Entered: 11/01/2024)Attachment
Nov 1, 2024COMPLAINT against Atomi, Inc.. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,961, # 2 Exhibit 2. U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,591, # 3 Exhibit 3. U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,414, # 4 Exhibit 4. U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,497, # 5 Exhibit 5. U.S. Pat. No. RE49,320, # 6 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. No. 7,802,902, # 7 Exhibit 7. U.S. Pat. No. 9,188,318, # 8 Exhibit 8. U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,907, # 9 Exhibit 9. TM1814 Titan Micro Datasheet, # 10 Exhibit 10. V433 Schematic).(McArdle, Christopher) (Entered: 11/01/2024)Attachment
Nov 1, 2024COMPLAINT against Atomi, Inc.. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,961, # 2 Exhibit 2. U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,591, # 3 Exhibit 3. U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,414, # 4 Exhibit 4. U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,497, # 5 Exhibit 5. U.S. Pat. No. RE49,320, # 6 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. No. 7,802,902, # 7 Exhibit 7. U.S. Pat. No. 9,188,318, # 8 Exhibit 8. U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,907, # 9 Exhibit 9. TM1814 Titan Micro Datasheet, # 10 Exhibit 10. V433 Schematic).(McArdle, Christopher) (Entered: 11/01/2024)Attachment
Nov 1, 2024COMPLAINT against Atomi, Inc.. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,961, # 2 Exhibit 2. U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,591, # 3 Exhibit 3. U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,414, # 4 Exhibit 4. U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,497, # 5 Exhibit 5. U.S. Pat. No. RE49,320, # 6 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. No. 7,802,902, # 7 Exhibit 7. U.S. Pat. No. 9,188,318, # 8 Exhibit 8. U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,907, # 9 Exhibit 9. TM1814 Titan Micro Datasheet, # 10 Exhibit 10. V433 Schematic).(McArdle, Christopher) (Entered: 11/01/2024)Attachment
Nov 1, 2024COMPLAINT against Atomi, Inc.. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,961, # 2 Exhibit 2. U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,591, # 3 Exhibit 3. U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,414, # 4 Exhibit 4. U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,497, # 5 Exhibit 5. U.S. Pat. No. RE49,320, # 6 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. No. 7,802,902, # 7 Exhibit 7. U.S. Pat. No. 9,188,318, # 8 Exhibit 8. U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,907, # 9 Exhibit 9. TM1814 Titan Micro Datasheet, # 10 Exhibit 10. V433 Schematic).(McArdle, Christopher) (Entered: 11/01/2024)Attachment
Jan 30, 2025 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is ordered that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within sixty days of this Order in the event the settlement agreement is not completed and executed. Any such application filed after sixty days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered&q uot; by the Court. Pursuant to 3.G of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Docket Number 17 and to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 1/30/2025) (jca)PACER Document