IP Verse

Skechers U.S.A. Inc. V. Laforst Shoes, Inc. - 2:23-cv-06783

Explore the details of the Skechers U.S.A. Inc. V. Laforst Shoes, Inc. case under case number 2:23-cv-06783 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:23-cv-06783
Filing Date
Aug 17, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Skechers U.S.A. Inc. -
Laforst Shoes, Inc. -
Does -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Aug 17, 2023COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35879612 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 3 to Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 4 to Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 5 to Complaint) (Attorney Michael Hurey added to party Skechers U.S.A. Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Hurey, Michael) (Entered: 08/17/2023)PACER Document
Aug 17, 2023REPORT ON THE FILING OF DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OF TRADEMARK COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 08/17/2023,, filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc..(Hurey, Michael) Modified on 8/18/2023 (ghap). (Entered: 08/17/2023)PACER Document
Aug 17, 2023CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED FILED AS COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 08/17/2023,, filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc..(Hurey, Michael) Modified on 8/18/2023 (ghap). (Entered: 08/17/2023)PACER Document
Aug 17, 2023SUMMONS FILED AS COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 08/17/2023,, filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc..(Hurey, Michael) Modified on 8/18/2023 (ghap). (Entered: 08/17/2023)PACER Document
Aug 17, 2023CIVIL COVER SHEETS FILED AS COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 08/17/2023,, filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc..(Hurey, Michael) Modified on 8/18/2023 (ghap). (Entered: 08/17/2023)PACER Document
Aug 18, 2023NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) (Entered: 08/18/2023)PACER Document
Aug 18, 202321 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. (ghap) (Entered: 08/18/2023)PACER Document
Aug 18, 2023Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) (Entered: 08/18/2023)PACER Document
Aug 18, 2023NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) (Entered: 08/18/2023)PACER Document
Aug 24, 2023INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) (Entered: 08/24/2023)PACER Document
Aug 24, 2023PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II, upon Defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Patrick Chow, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy (Lerner, Marshall) (Entered: 08/24/2023)PACER Document
Sep 13, 2023MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Josephine L. Staton: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than September 20, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer to the Complaint; Request for Entry of Default; or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41). The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due. (lc) (Entered: 09/13/2023)PACER Document
Sep 18, 2023RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. IIto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, 12 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mattes, Bradford) (Entered: 09/18/2023)PACER Document
Oct 26, 2023 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton is hereby entered in favor of Skechers and against Laforst on each one of Skechers five claims that Laforst infringed each one of the following five United States design patents owned by Skechers. Skechers and La forst shall each bear their respective costs and attorney fees. The Court ORDERS as follows: Laforst and its officers, agents, employees, representatives, assigns, and attorneys and those in active concert or participation with Laforst who receive actual notice of this order, are enjoined. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). See document for further information. (jp)PACER Document