Explore the details of the Skechers U.S.A., Inc. V. L.L. Bean, Inc. case under case number 1:24-cv-05336 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-05336
Filing Date
Jul 15, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II -
L.L. Bean, Inc. -
Does -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Oct 3, 2024ORDER granting 28 Letter Motion for Conference Request GRANTED. The Initial Pretrial Conference on Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. will be held as a video conference via Microsoft Teams. The Teams information is below, and a direct link to the video conference will be sent to counsel in advance of the conference. Counsel are referred to Rule II(A)(2) of the Court's Individual Rules & Practices regarding remote conferences. Microsoft Teams Meeting ID: 274 277 061 180 // Passcode: eLFXfHThe Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No. 28.SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 10/3/2024) (jca) (Entered: 10/03/2024)PACER Document
Oct 10, 2024CIVIL CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The parties have conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Settlement discussions have taken place. Depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 and 31 shall be completed by the date set forth in Paragraph 5(e). This case is to be tried to a jury. As further set forth by this Order. SO ORDERED. ( Brief due by 4/2/2025., Deposition due by 3/5/2025., Expert Discovery due by 3/19/2025., Fact Discovery due by 3/5/2025., Reply to Response to Brief due by 5/7/2025., Responses to Brief due by 4/30/2025, Estimate length of trial 6 days. Claim Construction Hearing set for 6/4/2025 at 10:00 AM before Judge Margaret M. Garnett.) (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 10/10/2024) (tg) (Entered: 10/10/2024)PACER Document
Dec 23, 2024PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit [Proposed] Injunction and Dismissal).(Ligotti, Andrew) (Entered: 12/23/2024)PACER Document
Dec 26, 2024AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 12/26/2024 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (mml) (Entered: 12/26/2024)PACER Document
Dec 26, 2024 INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL: Based thereon, the Court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that: 1. LLB and those in active concert or participation with LLB who receive actual notice of this order, are enjoined from the manufacture, use, offer for sale, an d/or sale within the United States and/or from importing into the United States (1) the accused Freeport shoe, representative images of which appear below, and (2) any shoe falling within the scope of the Heel Cup Patents until expiration of the las t to expire of U.S. Pat. Nos. D992,888 and D992,888. 2. Upon entry of this injunction, this case is dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this action and over LLB in order to enforce this injunction as needed. 3. As between Skechers and LLB, each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 12/26/2024) (mml)PACER Document
Jul 16, 2024CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Margaret M. Garnett. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)PACER Document
Jul 16, 2024Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)PACER Document
Jul 16, 2024Case Designated ECF. (vf)PACER Document
Jul 16, 2024***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Andrew James Ligotti to RE-FILE Document No. 4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B) : a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf)PACER Document
Jul 16, 2024***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PATENT FORM. Notice to Attorney Andrew James Ligotti re: Document No. 5 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the Docket Number field on the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form was not completed by the attorney. Do not re-file the form. The Court has corrected the deficiency/deficiencies. (vf)PACER Document
Jul 24, 2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. 11 MOTION for Robert L. Lee to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29646049. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from State Bar of Georgia; Must supply either a declaration or a signed and notarized affidavit;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (rju)PACER Document
Jul 24, 2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 13 MOTION for Robert L. Lee to Appear Pro Hac Vice /Corrected Motion. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (rju)PACER Document
Jul 24, 2024ORDER granting 13 Motion for Robert L. Lee to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Margaret M. Garnett)(Text Only Order) (kv) (Entered: 07/24/2024)PACER Document
Aug 19, 2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 19 MOTION for Mircea A. Tipescu to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29768697. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (rju)PACER Document
Aug 19, 2024ORDER granting 19 Motion for Mircea A. Tipescu to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Margaret M. Garnett)(Text Only Order) (kv) (Entered: 08/19/2024)PACER Document
Aug 21, 2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 21 MOTION for Manish K. Mehta to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29781334. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (rju)PACER Document
Aug 21, 2024ORDER granting 21 Motion for Manish K. Mehta to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Margaret M. Garnett)(Text Only Order) (kv) (Entered: 08/21/2024)PACER Document
Oct 9, 2024Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Margaret M. Garnett: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 10/9/2024. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants were present. (Court Reporter Carly Davis) (kv)PACER Document
Dec 23, 2024PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit [Proposed] Injunction and Dismissal).(Ligotti, Andrew) (Entered: 12/23/2024)Attachment