IP Verse

Sta Group Llc V. Motorola Solutions, Inc. - 2:24-cv-00234

Explore the details of the Sta Group Llc V. Motorola Solutions, Inc. case under case number 2:24-cv-00234 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-00234
Filing Date
Apr 8, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
STA Group LLC -
Motorola Solutions, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

May 1, 2024NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by James A Shimota on behalf of STA Group LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10116687. (Shimota, James) (Entered: 05/01/2024)PACER Document
May 2, 2024NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Wesley Hill on behalf of STA Group LLC (Hill, Jack Wesley) (Entered: 05/02/2024)PACER Document
May 2, 2024NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of STA Group LLC (Fair, Andrea) (Entered: 05/02/2024)PACER Document
May 6, 2024REDACTION to 6 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 05/06/2024)PACER Document
May 14, 2024RESPONSE in Opposition re 6 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by STA Group LLC . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order proposed order)(Shimota, James) (Entered: 05/14/2024)PACER Document
May 22, 2024SEALED REPLY to Response to Motion re 6 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 05/22/2024)PACER Document
May 22, 2024MOTION to Seal Reply brief ISO Motion to Dismiss by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 05/22/2024)PACER Document
May 22, 2024SEALED REPLY to Response to Motion re 6 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 05/22/2024)PACER Document
May 27, 2024ORDER granting 20 MOTION to Seal Reply brief ISO Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/27/2024. (CH) (Entered: 05/28/2024)PACER Document
May 29, 2024REDACTION to 22 Sealed Reply to Response to Motion by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 05/29/2024)PACER Document
May 29, 2024SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 6 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by STA Group LLC . (Shimota, James) (Entered: 05/29/2024)PACER Document
Jun 11, 2024JOINT MOTION to Stay by Motorola Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Maier, Robert) (Entered: 06/11/2024)PACER Document
Jun 12, 2024ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/12/2024. (NKL) (Entered: 06/12/2024)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2024STIPULATION of Dismissal regarding '134 Patent by STA Group LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order proposed order)(Shimota, James) (Entered: 06/24/2024)PACER Document
Jun 25, 2024ORDER granting 28 STIPULATION of Dismissal regarding '134 Patent b. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/25/2024. (CH) (Entered: 06/25/2024)PACER Document
Apr 8, 2024Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (CH)PACER Document
Apr 8, 2024In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH)PACER Document
May 22, 2024Clerk's LR CV-10(d) Notice of Deficiency as to 21 Sealed Reply to Response to Motion - LR CV-5(a)(7) or CR-49(a) requires this document to include a statement after the certificate of service that certifies that a motion to seal has been filed or authorization to seal has been obtained. Recommended cure: Within one day, Filer must refile with the word Corrected in the title of the document. The filer should use the same ECF event and when offered the docket text enhancement dropdown, select CORRECTED so it will also appear in the docket text. (NKL)PACER Document