IP Verse

Stingray Ip Solutions Llc V. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company - 2:24-cv-00868

Explore the details of the Stingray Ip Solutions Llc V. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company case under case number 2:24-cv-00868 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:24-cv-00868
Filing Date
Oct 28, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Stingray IP Solutions LLC -
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Feb 6, 2025ORDER granting 26 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 Responses due by 2/24/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/06/2025)PACER Document
Feb 11, 2025UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Protective Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bragalone, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/11/2025)PACER Document
Feb 11, 2025NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Saad, Terry) (Entered: 02/11/2025)PACER Document
Feb 13, 2025ORDER granting 32 Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/12/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/13/2025)PACER Document
Feb 18, 2025JOINT MOTION for Protective Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bragalone, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/18/2025)PACER Document
Feb 19, 2025PROTECTIVE ORDER (Motion(s) 35 terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/19/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/19/2025)PACER Document
Feb 24, 2025RESPONSE re 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bragalone, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/24/2025)PACER Document
Mar 3, 2025UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) (Entered: 03/03/2025)PACER Document
Mar 3, 2025ORDER granting 38 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 Replies due by 3/11/2025.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/3/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 03/03/2025)PACER Document
Mar 5, 2025NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company regarding Invalidity Contentions and Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 03/05/2025)PACER Document
Mar 11, 2025REPLY to Response re 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Shelton, Barry) (Entered: 03/11/2025)PACER Document
Mar 17, 2025UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 41 Reply to Response to Motion by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Saad, Terry) (Entered: 03/17/2025)PACER Document
Mar 18, 2025ORDER granting 42 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 41 Reply to Response to Motion Responses due by 3/25/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/18/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 03/18/2025)PACER Document
Mar 25, 2025SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re 23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Bragalone, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/25/2025)PACER Document
Oct 28, 2024Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL)PACER Document
Oct 28, 2024In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)PACER Document
Nov 12, 2024Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company to 12/20/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)PACER Document
Dec 18, 2024Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer is now due 1/6/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) (Entered: 12/18/2024)PACER Document
Jan 21, 2025Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 1/21/2025 from 01:32 PM - 02:35 PM. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court proceeded to provide counsel with Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter - Shawn McRoberts) (aeb)PACER Document