IP Verse

Toileaf, Llc V. Hamesh Shahani - 2:23-cv-02421

Explore the details of the Toileaf, Llc V. Hamesh Shahani case under case number 2:23-cv-02421 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
2:23-cv-02421
Filing Date
Mar 31, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Val Vaniakin -
Hamesh Shahani -
Loo Ready, LLC -
Does -
Toileaf, LLC -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 27, 2023NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/24/2023 re Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, Third Party Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, 17 25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 06/27/2023)PACER Document
Jun 27, 2023ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Having reviewed Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Toileaf's ("Toileaf") application for an extension of time to respond to counterclaims 25, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Toileaf's deadline to respond to the counterclaims filed by Defendant Hamesh Shahani is extended to 7/24/2023. (gk) (Entered: 06/27/2023)PACER Document
Sep 12, 2023 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Based on the Stipulated Dismissal 39 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), including all claims, counterclaims, and causes of action which were or could have been asserted among the parties. Furthermore, the Parties are to bear their own fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)PACER Document