Explore the details of the Tomas V. Manifold Cloud Services Ltd. case under case number 5:24-cv-01210 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
5:24-cv-01210
Filing Date
Jul 17, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Manifold Cloud Services Ltd. -
Alexander Tomas -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jul 17, 2024Complaint with jury demand against Manifold Cloud Services Ltd. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12649393. Filed by Alexander Tomas. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - 11549711 Patent, # 2 Exhibit B - Letter to Jim Bergman, # 3 Exhibit C - Infringement Letters, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse) (Entered: 07/17/2024)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Summons in a Civil Action filed by Alexander Tomas. Related document(s) 1 .(Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse) (Entered: 07/17/2024)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Alexander Tomas. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse) (Entered: 07/17/2024)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (E,CK)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (E,CK)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to Local Patent Rules. (E,CK)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Manifold Cloud Services Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Consent Form) (E,CK) (Entered: 07/17/2024)PACER Document
Jul 17, 2024Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 7/17/2024. (P,K)PACER Document