IP Verse

Vlsi Technology Llc V. Patent Quality Assurance, Llc - 3:24-cv-00213

Explore the details of the Vlsi Technology Llc V. Patent Quality Assurance, Llc case under case number 3:24-cv-00213 involving a cause of action for Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
3:24-cv-00213
Filing Date
Mar 20, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
VLSI Technology LLC -
Patent Quality Assurance, LLC -
Joseph Uradnik -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Apr 23, 2024Memorandum in Opposition re 13 MOTION to Compel Defendant PQA to Comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 04/23/2024)PACER Document
Apr 26, 2024ORDER - For good cause shown, and after finding that each of the three factors weighs in favor of a stay in this matter, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (ECF No. 21 .) With respect to VLSI's Motion to Compel, (ECF No. 13), Defendants SHALL file their opposition briefing on April 23, 2024, and Plaintiff SHALL file its reply on April 29, 2024. With respect to VLSI's Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 15), Defendants SHALL file their opposition briefing on April 30, 2024, and Plaintiff SHALL file its reply on May 6, 2024. With respect to the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (ECF Nos. 3, 5) all further briefing requests for hearing, and other relief SHALL BE ST A YED pending the Court's ruling on the Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 15). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 4/25/2026. (jpow, ) (Entered: 04/26/2024)PACER Document
Apr 29, 2024Reply to Motion re 13 MOTION to Compel Defendant PQA to Comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Joseph Uradnik Declaration)(Marcus, Ellen) (Entered: 04/29/2024)PACER Document
Apr 30, 2024Memorandum in Opposition re 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 04/30/2024)PACER Document
May 6, 2024REPLY to Response to Motion re 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Marcus, Ellen) Modified text on 5/8/2024 (adun, ). (Entered: 05/06/2024)PACER Document
Dec 5, 2024MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/5/2024. (adun, ) (Entered: 12/05/2024)PACER Document
Dec 5, 2024ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court GRANTS VLSI Technology LLC's Motion to Compel Defendant Patent Quality Assurance, LLC to Comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1. 13 . Patent Quality Assurance, LLC SHALL file a Disclosure Statement identifying its members as required by Local Rule 7.1 no later than eleven (11) days from the date or entry or this Order. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/5/2024. (adun, ) (Entered: 12/05/2024)PACER Document
Apr 23, 2024Memorandum in Opposition re 13 MOTION to Compel Defendant PQA to Comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 04/23/2024)Attachment
Dec 16, 2024Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC. (Reilly, Craig) (Main Document 29 replaced on 12/17/2024) (adun, ). (Entered: 12/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 16, 2024Sealed Document re 29 Financial Disclosure Statement. (Reilly, Craig) (Main Document 30 replaced on 12/17/2024) (adun, ). (Entered: 12/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 16, 2024MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 16, 2024Memorandum in Support re 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 16, 2024Notice of Filing Sealing Motion LCvR5(C) by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik re 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 (Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/16/2024)PACER Document
Dec 16, 2024Memorandum in Support re 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/16/2024)Attachment
Dec 16, 2024Memorandum in Support re 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC, Joseph Uradnik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/16/2024)Attachment
Dec 19, 2024Opposition to 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Marcus, Ellen) (Entered: 12/19/2024)PACER Document
Mar 25, 2024Case transferred in from Alexandria Division, Case Number 1:24cv438. Case assigned to Judge District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jsmi, )PACER Document
Dec 26, 2024REPLY to Response to Motion re 31 MOTION to Seal Re Doc. 29 & 30 filed by Patent Quality Assurance, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit C)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 12/26/2024)PACER Document
Feb 13, 2025MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 2/13/2025. (adun, )PACER Document
Feb 13, 2025ORDER- For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court GRANTS VLSI Technology LLC's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 15 .) The Court REMANDS this action to the Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria. The Court DENIES AS MOOT: (1) Defendant Joseph Uradnik's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6), (ECF No. 3 ); (2) Defendant Patent Quality Assurance, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6), (ECF No. 5 ); and (3) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File PQA's Revised Financial Interest Disclosure Under Seal and For Other Relief. (ECF No. 31 ). Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 2/13/2025. (adun, ) (Entered: 02/13/2025)PACER Document