IP Verse

Web 2.0 Technologies, Llc V. Accelo, Inc. - 1:23-cv-00001

Explore the details of the Web 2.0 Technologies, Llc V. Accelo, Inc. case under case number 1:23-cv-00001 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:23-cv-00001
Filing Date
Jan 1, 2023
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC -
Pennar Software Corporation -
Accelo, Inc. -

Patents Involved in the Case

This case involves 2 patents, each of which is central to the dispute. These patents may be subject to claims of infringement, challenges to their validity, or other issues concerning their scope and enforcement.

Application NumberPatent Number
-US8117644B2
-US6845448B2

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Dec 12, 2023SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/29/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 12/29/2023. Fact Discovery completed by 12/19/2024. Opening Expert Reports due by 7/3/2025. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 7/31/2025. Reply Expert Reports due by 8/21/2025. Expert Discovery due by 9/18/2025. A Trial Sequencing Conference is set for 2/17/2026 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Dispositive Motions due by 11/13/2025. Answering Brief due 12/4/2025. Reply Brief due 12/18/2025. Claim Construction Opening Brief served by 2/13/2025. Claim Construction Answering Brief served by 3/13/2025. Claim Construction Reply Brief served by 3/27/2025. Claim Construction Surreply Brief served by 4/10/2025. Joint Claim Construction Brief filed by 4/17/2025. A Markman Hearing is set for 5/15/2025 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A Pretrial Conference is set for 4/13/2026 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 5-day Jury Trial is set for 4/20/2026 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/12/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 12/12/2023)PACER Document
Dec 14, 2023STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order to Clarify Page Limits by Accelo, Inc. (Clark, Cameron) Modified on 12/18/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 12/14/2023)PACER Document
Dec 18, 2023SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATION re (26 in 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 26 in 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 24 in 1:23-cv-00343-MN, 26 in 1:23-cv-00104-MN, 26 in 1:23-cv-00004-MN, 27 in 1:23-cv-00107-MN) Stipulation and Order to Clarify Page Limits. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/18/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 12/18/2023)PACER Document
Dec 20, 2023MOTION for Extension of Time to - filed by Pennar Software Corporation, Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 12/20/2023)PACER Document
Jan 4, 2024NOTICE of Settlement in Principle and Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay Deadlines by Pennar Software Corporation, Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC (Devlin, Timothy) Modified on 1/5/2024 (dlw). (Entered: 01/04/2024)PACER Document
Jan 26, 2024STIPULATION of Dismissal by Pennar Software Corporation, Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 01/26/2024)PACER Document
Jan 26, 2024SO ORDERED re 31 Stipulation of Dismissal ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/26/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 01/26/2024)PACER Document
Jan 26, 2024Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s). (Attachments: # 1 Stipulation of Dismissal)(mdb) (Entered: 01/26/2024)PACER Document
Jan 4, 2023Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 1:23-cv-00004-MN (rjb)PACER Document
Apr 12, 2023SO ORDERED re 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint to May 18, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Accelo, Inc. answer due 5/18/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/12/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
May 18, 2023SO ORDERED re 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Timothy P. Getzoff and Ellen K. Levish filed by Accelo, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/18/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Sep 14, 2023ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed, coordinated order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/14/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 09/14/2023)PACER Document
Oct 2, 2023ORAL ORDER - Having reviewed the various Web2.0 Technologies cases filed in this District and beyond, it appears that in certain pending cases with substantially the same infringement allegations, Plaintiff includes as a party Pennar Software Corporation because it is purportedly "the owner by assignment of 100% interest in the Asserted Patents" i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644. See, e.g., First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. 37signals LLC d/b/a Basecamp, No. 1:23-0230 (N.D. Ill. July 11, 2023); First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Nulab Inc., No. 1:23-2589 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2023); see also First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk, Inc., No. 23-0105-MN (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2023). Pennar Software Corporation is also listed as the assignee on the face of these two patents, which are the only patents asserted in any of the Web2.0 Technologies cases in this District. Yet Pennar Software Corporation is not a plaintiff in the cases pending in this District except one (against Zendesk). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before October 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court explaining the discrepancy in plaintiffs among the various cases and indicating whether Pennar Software Corporation is a required plaintiff in all of the related cases pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/2/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/02/2023)PACER Document
Oct 17, 2023ORAL ORDER re (21 in 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 19 in 1:23-cv-00344-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00105-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00345-MN, 18 in 1:23-cv-00004-MN, 18 in 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 19 in 1:23-cv-00107-MN, 18 in 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 18 in 1:23-cv-00104-MN, 19 in 1:23-cv-00042-MN, 16 in 1:23-cv-00343-MN) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit a Proposed, Coordinated Scheduling Order - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED-IN-PART. The deadline to file the proposed scheduling order shall be extended by forty-five (45) days (until 11/30/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/17/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/17/2023)PACER Document
Nov 9, 2023SO ORDERED re (22 in 1:23-cv-00104-MN, 25 in 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 22 in 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 20 in 1:23-cv-00343-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00344-MN, 22 in 1:23-cv-00004-MN, 22 in 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 27 in 1:23-cv-00345-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00107-MN) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to December 4, 2023. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/9/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Dec 1, 2023SO ORDERED, re (21 in 1:23-cv-00343-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00104-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 24 in 1:23-cv-00107-MN, 27 in 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00004-MN, 23 in 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 24 in 1:23-cv-00344-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00345-MN) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME regarding (1) the deadline for the parties to Submit a Proposed Coordinated Scheduling Order to 12/7/2023 and (2) the deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to 12/22/2023. See Stip for Details filed by Trello, Inc.. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/1/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00001-MN et al.(mdb)PACER Document
Dec 21, 2023SO ORDERED re (26 in 1:23-cv-00343-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00104-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00004-MN, 25 in 1:23-cv-00342-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 28 in 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 29 in 1:23-cv-00107-MN) MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to 1/5/2024. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/21/2023. (dlw)PACER Document
Jan 5, 2024ORAL ORDER re 29 Notice of Settlement in Principle and Stipulation and Order to Stay Deadlines - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines in this case are stayed. If a dismissal is not filed prior to 2/9/2024, the parties shall submit a joint status report on or before that date. Should the stay be lifted, the Defendant's deadline to respond to the 20 Amended Complaint shall be seven days from the date the stay is lifted. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/5/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 01/05/2024)PACER Document