IP Verse

Weissbrod Gurvey V. Hochul - 1:24-cv-00211

Explore the details of the Weissbrod Gurvey V. Hochul case under case number 1:24-cv-00211 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:24-cv-00211
Filing Date
Feb 13, 2024
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Hon. Laura Taylor Swain -
Kevin O'Toole -
Brian O'Dwyer -
Amy R. Weissbrod Gurvey -
Frank Hoare -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jan 24, 2025 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER. The Court hereby ORDERS that the NYS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 38 , is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant O'Toole's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 39 , is GRANTED. The Court also ORDERS that Plaintiff's request to amend the Complaint for a second time, Dkt. No. 48 , is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 9 , is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety and against all Defendants. The Court further ORDERS that the Clerk serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules and close the case. SO ORDERED by U.S. District Judge Anne M. Nardacci on 1/24/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Unreported Decisions). (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff by regular and certified mail). (mab)PACER Document
May 29, 2025 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER. The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motions, Dkt. Nos., 64 , 65 and 72 are DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's frivolous and vexatious litigation practices are REFERRED to Chief Unite d States District Judge Brenda K. Sannes for consideration of a possible pre-filing order. The Court further ORDERS that Defendants' request for leave to file a motion to enjoin Plaintiff from further filings is DENIED as moot in light of this Court's referral of Plaintiff's litigation practices to Chief United States District Judge Brenda K. Sannes. The Court further ORDERS that the Clerk serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Anne M. Nardacci on 5/29/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Unpublished Decisions) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff by regular mail). (mab)PACER Document