IP Verse

Yieldmo, Inc. V. Teads, Inc. - 1:25-cv-00737

Explore the details of the Yieldmo, Inc. V. Teads, Inc. case under case number 1:25-cv-00737 involving a cause of action for Patent Infringement. Review key information about the parties involved, the patents in question, and the docket entries.

Case Details

Case Number
1:25-cv-00737
Filing Date
Jan 24, 2025
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved in the Case

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Teads, Inc. -
Yieldmo, Inc. -
Teads SA -

Patents Involved in the Case

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jul 21, 2025 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 51 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Teads SA, Teads SARL, Teads, Inc. against Yieldmo, Inc. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 21, 2025, the Court holds that the Patents at issue are drawn to patent ineligible subject matter, and therefore has granted Teads's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 7/21/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)PACER Document
Jul 21, 2025 OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 MOTION to Dismiss Yieldmo's First Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) for Insufficient Service of Process. filed by Teads SARL, Te ads, Inc., Teads SA, 27 MOTION to Dismiss / Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) For Failure to State a Claim and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) for Insufficient Service of Process. filed by Teads, Inc., Tead s SA. For the foregoing reasons, the Court holds that the Patents at issue are drawn to patent ineligible subject matter, and therefore grants Teads's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/21/2025) (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.PACER Document