Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc. (Case No. 1:26-cv-00420), filed on Jul 7, 2026 in the District Court, D. Idaho involving patent infringement. This case involves patent infringement claims between the parties. Explore details about the litigants, key filings, and major docket updates.
The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.
| Name | Represented By |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc | - |
| Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC | - |
Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.
The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.
| Date | Docket Entry | Type |
|---|---|---|
Set alerts for critical docket entry | ||
| Jun 12, 2026 | Text Order GRANTING 78 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Martin G. Walker Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiff's non-opposition as stated in Dkt. 80, and in light of Defendant's representation that its motion to disqualify and Exhibits 1 and 3 to the motion contain confidential business and personnel information, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Motion to Disqualify, (Dkt. 78-1), Exhibit 1 to the motion, (Dkt. 78-3), and Exhibit 3 to the motion, (Dkt. 78-5), under SEAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an unsealed, redacted version of its Motion to Disqualify only on or before June 22, 2026. There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lslc) | PACER Document |
| Jun 12, 2026 | Text Order GRANTING 80 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Defendant's non-opposition, and in light of Plaintiff's representation that its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify quotes from the contents of Defendant's sealed Motion to Disqualify and sealed supporting exhibits, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file under SEAL Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify, (Dkt. 80-2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an unsealed, redacted version of its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify only on or before June 24, 2026. There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lslc) | PACER Document |
| Jun 12, 2026 | Redacted Copy of Plaintiff AMT's Opposition to Defendant Micron's Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) of 79 Sealed Document by Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC. (Nelson, Justin) | PACER Document |
| Jun 12, 2026 | Sealed Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Martin G. Walker filed by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) (Entered: 06/15/2026) | PACER Document |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Sealed Opposition to Motion to Disqualify AMT's Expert Dr. Martin G. Walker filed by Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) | PACER Document |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Motion for leave to File Reply in Support of Opposed Motion to Transfer Under Seal by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) | PACER Document |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Text Order GRANTING 84 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Reply Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, and in light of Defendant's representation that its Reply contains confidential business and personnel information, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file Defendant's Reply in Support of Opposed Motion to Transfer, (Dkt. 84-1), under SEAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an unsealed, redacted version of its Reply on or before June 23, 2026. There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lslc) | PACER Document |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Sealed Reply in Support of Opposed Motion to Transfer filed by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) (Entered: 06/17/2026) | PACER Document |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of its Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Martin G. Walker Under Seal by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) (Entered: 06/17/2026) | PACER Document |
| Jun 18, 2026 | Text Order GRANTING 86 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, and in light of Defendant's representation that this filing contains confidential business and personnel information, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert, (Dkt. 86-2), under SEAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an unsealed, redacted version of its Reply on or before June 25, 2026. There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lslc) | PACER Document |
| Jun 18, 2026 | Sealed Reply in Support of its Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Martin G. Walker Under Seal by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (dm) (Entered: 06/23/2026) | PACER Document |
| Jun 22, 2026 | Redacted Copy of 82 Sealed Motion filed by Micron Technology, Inc. pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures by Micron Technology, Inc.. (Riffe, Timothy) | PACER Document |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Redacted Copy of Micron's Reply ISO Opposed Motion to Transfer of 85 Sealed Document by Micron Technology, Inc.. (McKeon, Michael) | PACER Document |
| Jun 24, 2026 | Redacted Copy (Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Disqualify AMT's Expert) of 83 Sealed Document by Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC. (Nelson, Justin) | PACER Document |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Redacted Copy REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS EXPERT DR. MARTIN G. WALKER of 88 Sealed Document by Micron Technology, Inc.. (Riffe, Timothy) | PACER Document |
| Jul 6, 2026 | ORDER GRANTING 32 Sealed Motion to Transfer. ORDERED that this matter be TRANSFERRED to the District of Idaho. Signed by Judge Susan Hightower. (dm) | PACER Document |
| Jul 7, 2026 | Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 1:25-cv-01036. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. | PACER Document |
| Jul 7, 2026 | DOCKET TEXT NOTICE - All out of state counsel continuing representation need to obtain local counsel and file an Application for Pro Hac Vice. Please see Local Rule, Civil Rule 83.4 Bar Admission e) Pro Hac Vice/Local Counsel and ECF Procedures 3. Registration, Logins and Passwords. B. Limited Registered Participants.1. (jd) | PACER Document |
| Jul 7, 2026 | NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC, Micron Technology Inc re 1 Complaint, 27 Answer to Complaint. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/6/2026. (jd) | PACER Document |
| Jul 7, 2026 | DOCKET TEXT NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office if you haven't already done so. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jd) | PACER Document |