IP Verse

Reed Semiconductor Corp. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. - 3:26-cv-08333

Reed Semiconductor Corp. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Case No. 3:26-cv-08333), filed on Aug 11, 2026 in the District Court, N.D. California involving patent infringement. This case involves patent infringement claims between the parties. Explore details about the litigants, key filings, and major docket updates.

Case Details

Case Number
3:26-cv-08333
Filing Date
Aug 11, 2026
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Court
District Court, N.D. California
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Reed Semiconductor Corp. -
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. -

Patents Involved

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Apr 7, 2026STATUS REPORT advising that Defendant's Motion to Transfer and Motion to Dismiss are Fully Briefed and Ripe for Adjudication by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Gillespie, Rachel) (Entered: 04/07/2026)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2026Redacted Copy Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Rule 12(b)(3), Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of 48 Response in Support of Motion,, by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Gillespie, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2026)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2026Redacted Copy - Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3), Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), and Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of 44 Response in Opposition to Motion,, by Reed Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 9, # 2 Exhibit 10)(Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 04/09/2026)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2026Redacted Copy - Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California of 45 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Reed Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 7, # 2 Exhibit 8)(Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 04/09/2026)PACER Document
Apr 9, 2026Redacted Copy Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California of 49 Response in Support of Motion, by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Gillespie, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2026)PACER Document
Apr 16, 2026Joint MOTION to Continue - Joint Motion to Continue Hearing by Reed Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 04/16/2026)PACER Document
Apr 17, 2026Joint MOTION for Confidentiality/Protective Order - Joint Motion For Entry of Stipulated Protective Order by Reed Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order). Motions referred to Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 04/17/2026)PACER Document
Apr 17, 2026ORDER GRANTING 56 Motion to Continue. Signed by Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (cav) (Entered: 04/17/2026)PACER Document
Apr 17, 2026Motion Hearing RE 13 & 22 set for 5/20/2026 02:30 PM before Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (cav)PACER Document
Apr 24, 2026ORDER GRANTING 57 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (nnw) (Entered: 04/24/2026)PACER Document
May 20, 2026Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dan N. MacLemore: Motion Hearing held on 5/20/2026 re 13 & 22 . PROCEEDINGS: Case called for Motions Hearing. Counsel enter appearances and announced ready. The Court heard argument and statements from Counsel. Order forthcoming. Hearing concluded. (Court Reporter FTR.)(Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (nnw) (Entered: 05/21/2026)PACER Document
May 28, 2026NOTICE of Supplemental Authority by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Gillespie, Rachel) (Entered: 05/28/2026)PACER Document
Jun 15, 2026ORDER GRANTING 22 Motion to Change Venue - It is further ORDERED that all unreached deadlines in this case are STAYED until further order of this or the transferee Court. On July 7, 2026, and not before, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to take all actions necessary to TRANSFER the above- captioned case to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (nnw) (Entered: 06/16/2026)PACER Document
Jun 15, 2026ORDER STAYING CASE until July 6, 2026. Signed by Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (nnw)PACER Document
Jun 22, 2026Transcript filed of Proceedings held on May 20, 2026, Proceedings Transcribed: Motions Hearing. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Arlinda Rodriguez, Telephone number: 512-391-8791. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript to ensure compliance with the FRCP 5.2(a)/FRCrP 49.1(a). A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Notice of Redaction Request must be filed within 21 days. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 7/13/2026, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2026, Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/21/2026, (Rodriguez, Arlinda) (Entered: 06/22/2026)PACER Document
Jul 2, 2026Opposed MOTION for Leave to File - Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer - Plaintiff's OPPOSED Motion for Leave to File Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer (Dkt. 62) Out of Time by Reed Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A (FILED UNDER SEAL)). Motions referred to Judge Dan N. MacLemore. (Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 07/02/2026)PACER Document
Jul 2, 2026Sealed Document - PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER (Exhibit A) filed pursuant to W.D. Texas SDS procedures. (nnw) (Entered: 07/02/2026)PACER Document
Jul 3, 2026Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., re 64 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File - Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer - Plaintiff's OPPOSED Motion for Leave to File Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer (Dkt. 62) Out of Time filed by Plaintiff Reed Semiconductor Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Untimely Objections to Order Granting Motion to Transfer Venue)(Gillespie, Rachel) (Entered: 07/03/2026)PACER Document
Jul 8, 2026REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Reed Semiconductor Corp., re 64 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File - Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer - Plaintiff's OPPOSED Motion for Leave to File Objections to the Order Granting Motion to Transfer (Dkt. 62) Out of Time filed by Plaintiff Reed Semiconductor Corp. - Plaintiff's REPLY In Support Of Its Motion For Leave To File Objections To The Order Granting Motion To Transfer (Rambo, Rick) (Entered: 07/08/2026)PACER Document
Aug 7, 2026ORDER DENYING REED SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.S OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 64 and TRANSFERRING the case to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) (Entered: 08/07/2026)PACER Document