Roar Athletic Performance Corp. v. Masciowsky S.R.L. - 3:26-cv-01011

Roar Athletic Performance Corp. v. Masciowsky S.R.L. (Case No. 3:26-cv-01011), filed on Jun 24, 2026 in the District Court, D. Connecticut involving patent infringement. This case involves patent infringement claims between the parties. Explore details about the litigants, key filings, and major docket updates.

Case Details

Case Number
3:26-cv-01011
Filing Date
Jun 24, 2026
Cause of Action
Patent Infringement
Status
-
Court
District Court, D. Connecticut
Nature of Suit
Patent

Parties Involved

The following parties are involved in this case, with their respective legal representatives for the case.

NameRepresented By
Roar Athletic Performance Corp. -
Masciowsky S.R.L. -

Patents Involved

Patents not found - set an alert to get notified when patents are added.

Docket Entries

The Docket Entries section provides a chronological list of all significant filings and court actions in this case.

DateDocket EntryType

Set alerts for critical docket entry

Jun 24, 2026COMPLAINT against Masciowsky SRL ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8656059.), filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Hornat, Alexander) Modified on 6/25/2026 (tm). (Entered: 06/24/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026COMPLAINT against Masciowsky SRL ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8656059.), filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Hornat, Alexander) Modified on 6/25/2026 (tm). (Entered: 06/24/2026)Attachment
Jun 24, 2026COMPLAINT against Masciowsky SRL ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8656059.), filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Hornat, Alexander) Modified on 6/25/2026 (tm). (Entered: 06/24/2026)Attachment
Jun 24, 2026COMPLAINT against Masciowsky SRL ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8656059.), filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Hornat, Alexander) Modified on 6/25/2026 (tm). (Entered: 06/24/2026)Attachment
Jun 25, 2026NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 7 Standing Protective Order, 1 Complaint, filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp., 11 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 2 Notice (Other) filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp., 9 Notice re: AI-Assisted Research, 3 Disclosure Statement filed by Roar Athletic Performance Corp., 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, 10 Standing Order on Patent Cases, 6 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 6/25/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 25, 2026ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Masciowsky S.R.L.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Alexander T. Hornat* *McCarter & English, LLP* *265 Franklin Street* *Boston, MA 02110*. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 25, 2026AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed (Attachments: # 1 copy of complaint) (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Standing Order on Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/24/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/24/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/24/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/24/2026 Discovery due by 12/28/2026 Dispositive Motions due by 1/28/2027 Signed by Clerk on 6/24/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/24/2026.(tm) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Stefan R. Underhill assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. (bf)PACER Document
Jun 24, 2026Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 6/24/2026. (to) (Entered: 06/25/2026)PACER Document
Jun 25, 2026Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Masciowsky S.R.L.. (Hornat, Alexander)PACER Document