Asphaltic membrane with mullite-containing granules

Patent No. US10227780 (titled "Asphaltic membrane with mullite-containing granules") on Dec 20, 2016. The application was issued on Mar 12, 2019.

What is this patent about?

’780 is related to the field of asphaltic roofing membranes and, more specifically, to highly reflective granules used to coat these membranes. In the roofing industry, granules are applied to bituminous substrates to protect the underlying asphalt from solar radiation and to improve the energy efficiency of buildings by reflecting heat. While conventional granules often rely on expensive pigments like titanium dioxide or inert mineral particles, there is a persistent need for cost-effective materials that achieve high solar reflectance without sacrificing durability or weatherability.

The underlying idea behind ’780 is that the solar reflectivity of a roofing granule is not just a function of its color, but is driven by the internal microstructure of the material. The invention identifies that by precisely controlling the formation of mullite crystallites within an aluminosilicate matrix, one can maximize light scattering at the internal interfaces between the crystals and the surrounding non-mullite phase. This scattering effect is optimized when the concentration, size, and physical geometry of these microscopic crystals are held within specific ranges, effectively turning the internal structure of the granule into a reflective engine.

The claims of ’780 focus on a roofing article featuring an asphaltic substrate coated with granules containing a mullite concentration between 35 wt % and 63 wt %. The independent claims specifically protect granules where the mullite crystallites have a defined size—between 25 nm and 65 nm—and a specific aspect ratio of at least 1.5. Additionally, the claims cover membranes where these granules are characterized by high chemical purity, specifically containing less than 3.5 wt % of alkali or alkaline earth oxides, which ensures the refractory integrity of the material.

In practice, these granules are typically produced by the controlled calcination of kaolin clay at temperatures between 1000°C and 1300°C. This thermal process triggers the dehydroxylation of the clay and the subsequent growth of needle-like or platelet-shaped mullite crystals. By managing the soak time and temperature, manufacturers can achieve the targeted crystallite aspect ratio, which refers to the ratio of the crystal's length to its width. These engineered granules are then dropped onto a hot asphaltic substrate during the manufacturing process, where they adhere to form a water-impervious, heat-reflective barrier.

This invention differs from prior approaches by moving away from simple mineral fillers or complex vitreous coatings. Unlike standard calcined kaolin, which may have inconsistent crystalline structures, the ’780 patent defines the specific microstructural parameters—size and shape of the internal grains—required to reach panel reflectances of 70% or higher. Furthermore, by limiting fluxing agents like alkali oxides, the invention ensures that the granules remain chemically inert and stable under harsh environmental conditions, providing a high-performance alternative to traditional pigmented roofing materials.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’780 was filed, asphaltic roofing membranes were typically implemented using a coating of inert mineral particles, such as granite, silica sand, or slag, to provide weatherability and solar reflectance. At a time when systems commonly relied on standard No. 11 grade mineral granules to protect the underlying bituminous substrate, achieving high levels of solar reflectivity was often limited by the inherent optical properties of these natural materials. Hardware and manufacturing constraints made it non-trivial to increase the energy efficiency of a roof without relying on expensive additives like titanium dioxide or complex multi-layer vitreous coatings, which were frequently required to mask the dark appearance of the base rock.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement by integrating specific mullite-containing granules into the asphaltic substrate to achieve superior solar reflectance without the need for traditional whitening additives. This architectural shift focuses on the discovery that tailoring the mullite concentration (between 35 wt % and 63 wt %) and the specific crystallite size (25 nm to 65 nm) directly optimizes light scattering at the interfaces of the crystallite boundaries and the non-mullite matrix. This configuration overcomes the technical constraint of low reflectivity in standard mineral-coated membranes, enabling a panel solar reflectance of at least 65% through the precise control of the aluminosilicate phase and grain geometry rather than through surface-level pigments alone.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 27 claims, with claims 1 and 20 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a reflective roofing article or asphaltic membrane featuring an asphaltic substrate coated with mullite-containing granules, specifically defining the material through precise mullite weight concentrations, crystallite sizes, aspect ratios, and low levels of alkali or alkaline earth oxides. The dependent claims serve to further narrow the technical specifications of the granules by defining specific chemical compositions, alumina and silica weight percentages, amorphous matrix characteristics, particle size distributions, and the physical form of the roofing article as either a shingle or a rolled membrane.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Aspect ratio
(Claim 1)
The aspect ratio of the mullite crystallites refers to the ratio of the mullite crystallite size by the isolated (001) x-ray diffraction peak to the mullite crystallite size by the isolated (110) x-ray diffraction peak. It has unexpectedly been discovered that the aspect ratio of the mullite crystallites within the mullite-containing granules plays an important role in achieving desired panel reflectivity. In one or more embodiments, the aspect ratio may be at least 1.5.The ratio of the longest dimension of a mullite crystallite (determined by the (001) x-ray diffraction peak) to its shortest dimension (determined by the (110) x-ray diffraction peak).
Mullite concentration
(Claim 1)
The granules employed in practice of this invention include a certain amount of mullite, which amount may be referred to as mullite concentration. In one or more embodiments, the granules include from about 35 to about 63 wt % mullite, as determined by wide angle powder x-ray diffraction. It has been discovered that the mullite concentration is a critical parameter to achieving desired panel reflectivity.The specific weight percentage of the mullite crystalline phase within the total granule composition, as measured by wide angle powder x-ray diffraction.
Mullite-containing granules
(Claim 1, Claim 20)
The mullite-containing granules include crystallites of mullite dispersed within a matrix that includes non-mullite aluminosilicates, non-mullite siliceous materials, or both. Mullite refers to a subset of crystalline aluminosilicates represented by stoichiometric forms such as 3Al2O3.2SiO2 and 2Al2O3.SiO2. These granules are generally affixed to the upper surface of the membrane through adhesive forces offered by the asphaltic substrate.Particles comprising crystalline aluminosilicates (mullite) dispersed within a matrix of non-mullite materials, such as amorphous silica or non-mullite aluminosilicates, used as a reflective coating for roofing substrates.
Mullite crystallites
(Claim 1, Claim 20)
Mullite crystallites are dispersed within a matrix that includes non-mullite aluminosilicates and/or non-mullite siliceous materials. Enhanced reflectivity of the granules occurs due to increased light scattering at interfaces, such as at the mullite crystallite boundaries and mullite crystallite/non-mullite matrix boundaries. These crystallites may have a platelet shape, a needle shape, or a blend of both.Small crystalline regions of mullite within the granule that may exhibit platelet or needle-like shapes and provide light scattering interfaces to enhance solar reflectivity.
Non-mullite matrix
(Claim 20)
The mullite crystallites are dispersed within non-mullite aluminosilicates and/or non-mullite siliceous materials, which may be referred to as a matrix. In one or more embodiments, the matrix includes amorphous material, which refers to non-crystalline materials such as glassy silica. At least 50 wt % of the matrix may be amorphous.The surrounding material in a granule, often amorphous or glassy, in which the mullite crystallites are embedded; it typically consists of silica or aluminosilicates that have not formed a mullite crystal structure.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-00239May 14, 2025Champion Power Equipment, Inc. V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10227780

Application Number
US15385102A
Filing Date
Dec 20, 2016
Publication Date
Mar 12, 2019
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents