Patent No. US10488136 (titled "Selective fire firearm systems and methods") on Sep 23, 2016. The application was issued on Nov 26, 2019.
’136 is related to the field of selective fire firearms, specifically those capable of switching between a semi-automatic closed bolt mode and a fully automatic open bolt mode. In traditional automatic weapons, sustained fire can lead to extreme barrel temperatures, creating a significant safety risk where a chambered round may detonate spontaneously due to heat, a phenomenon known as cook off. While open bolt systems mitigate this by keeping the chamber empty until the trigger is pulled, they often lack the precision required for semi-automatic fire. The background context of this invention involves providing a hybrid system that maximizes both accuracy and thermal safety.
The underlying idea behind ’136 is a trigger group architecture that uses a mechanical trigger prop to dynamically alter the trigger’s resting geometry based on the selected firing mode. By physically propping the rear of the trigger during automatic fire, the system ensures the bolt carrier is caught in an open position by a dedicated sear while simultaneously preventing the trigger sear from catching the hammer. This insight allows the firearm to transition from a closed-bolt first shot to a sustained open-bolt cycle, ensuring that the weapon always finishes a burst with an empty, cooling chamber.
The claims of ’136 focus on a trigger group where the trigger itself occupies distinct forward positions depending on whether the weapon is set to fully automatic or semi-automatic operation. The independent claims specify a hardware configuration including a bolt carrier, a hammer with a primary notch, and a trigger prop that selectively blocks the trigger sear from engaging that notch during open bolt cycles. Additionally, the claims protect a safety mechanism involving a selector and an activator button that forces the user to consciously acknowledge the risk of cook off before switching from open bolt to closed bolt operation.
In practice, the invention utilizes a dual-pivot open bolt sear with a wishbone design to manage the high kinetic energy of a returning bolt carrier. When the trigger is released during a burst, the trigger prop slides a foot under the trigger tail, maintaining a specific angle that keeps the open bolt sear raised. The wishbone geometry of the sear allows its legs to flex slightly upon impact with the bolt carrier, dampening the shock and directing forces into the receiver walls rather than a fragile pivot pin, which prevents the sear from oscillating and causing an accidental discharge.
This approach differentiates itself from prior art by integrating a deliberate user-interface hurdle—the risk button—to prevent accidental transitions to a closed-bolt state when the barrel is dangerously hot. Unlike standard selective fire rifles that may fire the first shot of a burst with excessive recoil impulse, this system can be configured to deliver a consistent recoil impulse by ensuring subsequent shots benefit from the forward momentum of the bolt. By combining a propped trigger geometry with a shock-absorbing sear, the invention achieves a level of controllability and thermal safety that traditional closed-bolt or simple open-bolt designs cannot match.
In the mid-2010s when ’136 was filed, selective-fire weapon systems were typically implemented using dedicated trigger groups that functioned exclusively in either a closed-bolt or an open-bolt configuration. At a time when systems commonly relied on closed-bolt architectures for both semi-automatic and fully automatic modes to maintain mechanical simplicity, hardware constraints made the mitigation of thermal cook-off non-trivial during sustained high-capacity fire. In these traditional architectures, the transition between firing modes was generally limited to sear engagement timing rather than a fundamental shift in the bolt's resting position, often resulting in a chambered round remaining in contact with a high-temperature barrel after a fully automatic burst.
The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement in firearm architecture by integrating a hybrid firing cycle that dynamically shifts between closed-bolt and open-bolt operation based on the selected firing mode. This is achieved through a novel trigger group assembly featuring a trigger prop and a dedicated open-bolt sear that selectively overrides standard hammer engagement. The architectural shift allows the firearm to maintain the precision of a closed-bolt system for semi-automatic fire while automatically transitioning to an open-bolt state during fully automatic fire. This integration effectively overcomes the technical constraint of barrel overheating and involuntary ammunition detonation by ensuring the chamber remains empty and ventilated when the trigger is released after a high-rate burst, while simultaneously utilizing the reciprocating mass of the bolt carrier and buffer to distribute recoil impulses over a longer duration for improved controllability.
This patent contains a total of 30 claims, with claims 1 and 25 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a firearm trigger group architecture that enables both a fully automatic open bolt mode and a semi-automatic closed bolt mode, specifically utilizing a trigger with distinct forward positions for each mode, a hammer notch for semi-automatic engagement, a trigger prop to prevent such engagement during automatic fire, and a selector mechanism featuring an activator to regulate transitions between firing modes. The dependent claims serve to provide specific mechanical details for the trigger prop and selector button, introduce safety features such as a charging handle lever arm and a forward assist cover, define the structural geometry of the open bolt sear assembly, and outline methods for assembling and operating the firearm across its various firing configurations.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents