Process control systems and methods for use with filters and filtration processes

Patent No. US10583397 (titled "Process control systems and methods for use with filters and filtration processes") on May 13, 2015. The application was issued on Mar 10, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’397 is related to the field of biopharmaceutical downstream processing, specifically the integration and control of tangential flow filtration (TFF) within a continuous or connected purification train. In protein production, unit operations like chromatography and viral filtration typically run at constant flow rates, whereas ultrafiltration naturally experiences a decline in permeate flux as the product concentrates. This mismatch traditionally requires large intermediate pool tanks to decouple the steps, which increases the facility footprint and risks product degradation during hold times.

The underlying idea behind ’397 is to synchronize the variable hydraulic performance of a filtration unit with the steady-state requirements of upstream purification steps through active feedback control. By monitoring the permeate flow rate in real-time, the system can dynamically adjust either the upstream supply or the filtration parameters—such as feed crossflow and transmembrane pressure—to maintain a balanced mass flow. This insight allows for the replacement of massive storage vessels with small surge tanks, enabling a truly connected process where fluid moves seamlessly from purification to final formulation.

The claims of ’397 focus on a process control system and method that links upstream processing units to a downstream TFF loop via a feedback loop based on permeate flow sensing. The independent claims cover four specific control architectures: (i) modulating upstream flow to match filtration flux, (ii) adjusting the TFF feed pump to force the permeate flux to match a constant upstream flow, (iii) a tiered approach that switches from pump control to upstream flow control at a limit, and (iv) a hybrid mode that allows tank volume to fluctuate once a pump threshold is reached.

In practice, the invention overcomes the concentration polarization effect, where a boundary layer of protein builds up on the membrane and slows down filtration. Instead of allowing this to stall the process, the control system uses a Constant Flow Strategy by ramping up the feed pump’s crossflow rate as the protein concentration rises. This increases the mass transfer coefficient, effectively 'pushing' the permeate through at a steady rate that matches the output of the preceding chromatography columns, thereby keeping the retentate tank level stable.

This approach differs from prior solutions by eliminating the need for discrete batch processing and the associated large-scale infrastructure. Traditional systems treat ultrafiltration as a standalone end-step, but this invention treats it as a dynamic component of a connected downstream process. By utilizing the stagnant film model to predict and counteract flux decline, the system achieves high-concentration formulation without the flow disparities that previously made continuous bioprocessing difficult to implement at scale.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the mid-2010s when ’397 was filed, industrial bioprocessing systems were typically implemented using discrete unit operations where filtration, purification, and concentration stages functioned as independent batches. At a time when tangential flow filtration (TFF) was a standard method for cell separation and protein concentration, systems commonly relied on recirculating loops to achieve desired concentrations, which necessitated large hold tanks and complex manual balancing of volumes. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the real-time synchronization of upstream harvest rates with downstream filtration performance non-trivial, often resulting in significant volumetric bottlenecks when diafiltration was used to enhance product yield.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the architectural integration of a permeate-side sensing and control loop that dynamically links upstream processing units with downstream filtration stages. By utilizing a sensor at the permeate outlet to determine flow rates and automatically adjusting either the upstream processing flow or the feed pump speed, the system enables a continuous, synchronized flow that overcomes the technical constraint of concentration variability during diafiltration. This structural solution allows for the implementation of single-pass tangential flow filtration (SPTFF) in a manner that maintains a stable flow reduction factor despite changing feed concentrations, effectively enabling high-yield product recovery without the volumetric overhead typically associated with large-scale buffer exchange.

Claims

This patent contains 19 total claims, with claims 1, 7, and 13 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a process control system, a corresponding control method, and a protein purification process that utilize a sensor at a filter permeate outlet to dynamically adjust flow rates through upstream processing units or feed pumps to maintain system balance or manage tank volumes. The dependent claims serve to specify particular control configurations, such as decreasing upstream flow in response to permeate flow changes, establishing maximum flow rate thresholds, and incorporating protein formulation steps.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Flow rate at the permeate outlet
(Claim 1, Claim 7, Claim 13)
The system includes a sensor disposed at the permeate outlet to determine a flow rate at the permeate outlet. The control system is adapted to control the flow rate of one or more of the one or more upstream processing units according to the flow rate at the permeate outlet. This control achieves concentration of harvest fluid despite changing product concentrations.The measured volume of filtrate passing through the membrane per unit of time, serving as the feedback variable to regulate the entire process chain.
Permeate outlet
(Claim 1, Claim 7, Claim 13)
Filtrate is the component or components that pass through the membrane, also referred to as permeate. A sensor is disposed at the permeate outlet to determine a flow rate at the permeate outlet. The control system is coupled to the sensor and adapted to control the flow rate of upstream units or the feed pump according to the flow rate at the permeate outlet.The exit point of a filter through which the filtrate (the component that passes through the membrane) flows, used here as the primary sensing location for system control.
Predetermined pumping flow rate
(Claim 1, Claim 7, Claim 13)
The control system is adapted to control the feed pump according to the flow rate at the permeate outlet until a predetermined flow rate is reached for the feed pump. After the predetermined flow rate is reached, the system may control the flow rate of upstream processing units or permit a mismatch between the upstream flow and the feed pump flow. This permits the volume in the tank to vary.A specific threshold for the feed pump flow that triggers a shift in the control logic from pump-based adjustment to upstream process adjustment or tank volume variance.
Retentate outlet
(Claim 1, Claim 7, Claim 13)
Retentate refers to the component or components that do not pass through the membrane, but instead are retained by the membrane. The filter has an inlet, a permeate outlet and a retentate outlet connected to the tank. The process includes sensing a flow rate at the permeate outlet while the protein flows from the retentate outlet back to the tank.The exit point of a filter for components that do not pass through the membrane, which in this system is connected back to the tank to allow for recirculation or concentration.
Upstream processing units
(Claim 1, Claim 7, Claim 13)
An upstream process and a downstream process are connected where the downstream process is used concurrently with the upstream process. The operation of the upstream and downstream processes at least overlap temporally. Examples include a microfiltration element disposed in-line with the harvest stream from a bioreactor.One or more units, such as filtration or purification devices, that operate concurrently with and feed material into the downstream tank and filter assembly.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
1:25-cv-17596Nov 14, 2025AMGEN INC. et al v. ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. et al
1:25-cv-17278Nov 6, 2025AMGEN INC. v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
1:25-cv-17277Nov 6, 2025AMGEN INC. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD.
1:25-cv-13358Jul 16, 2025Amgen Inc. V. Biocon Biologics, Inc.
1:25-cv-11867Jun 30, 2025Amgen Inc. V. Biocon Biologics, Inc.
1:25-cv-01080Feb 7, 2025Amgen Inc. V. Fresenius Kabi Usa, Llc

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10583397

Application Number
US15302762A
Filing Date
May 13, 2015
Publication Date
Mar 10, 2020
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents